- Posts: 42
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP, UC and DLA Queries and Results
- Why have descriptors if they are not going them ?
Why have descriptors if they are not going them ?
- Buckie
- Topic Author
- Offline
The reference to sitting for 42 mins having to get up twice, was in fact reference to how long you could stay at a work station before moving or standing up. Having to stand up every 15 minutes, and making it known it was with pain, again makes me think how the decision maker states “The evidence suggests Mr X can remain seated or unseated at a work station for longer than an hour ? “
I must be reading the questions wrong, so must get someone else to help me here !
Thanks all the same Gordon for your time, I’ll get to work on an Appeal…
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51287
Buckie wrote: My apologies Gordon, I presumed the test “Move from one chair, next to it, without help” Meant you had to shuffle from one to another ! Sorry, I didn’t even think about, you could stand up and move to it then sit down… The thought never crossed my mind.
The reference to sitting for 42 mins having to get up twice, was in fact reference to how long you could stay at a work station before moving or standing up. Having to stand up every 15 minutes, and making it known it was with pain, again makes me think how the decision maker states “The evidence suggests Mr X can remain seated or unseated at a work station for longer than an hour ? “
I must be reading the questions wrong, so must get someone else to help me here !
Thanks all the same Gordon for your time, I’ll get to work on an Appeal…
To a considerable extent this will depend on whether you were assessed under the old "rules" or the new ones.
If the old rules then only the longest period of your being seated or standing should be considered, so if you were only able the stay seated for 15 minutes and then moved to a standing position and back to a seated one every 5 minutes from then on, then only the initial 15 minutes that you were seated would count,
This is the result of an Upper Tribunal case at the end of last year, which qualified whether the test was standing and sitting or standing or sitting, however, the descriptor was re-worded in January to invalidate this judgement and now reads.
The Standing and Sitting descriptor
(i) standing unassisted by another person (even if free to move around) or;
(ii) sitting (even in an adjustable chair); or
(iii) a combination of (i) and (ii),
for more than x minutes, before needing to move away in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion.
I have underlined the key section. The intention of the descriptor is that the claimant can move between a seated and a standing position as they need to, and still be classed as being at a workstations, it is only when they move away from it that the descriptor is met.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pixie poppet
I have just had exactly the same thing. I can't walk without the aid of my stick and am in agony but apparently I can walk 200 m and I got 6 points!!
Yet I was rewarded high rate mobility with medicL evidence and no medical
Here's hoping your DLA appeal goes well
pixie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Buckie
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 42
Let’s face it if they take their time you inadvertently fail some of the descriptors ?
I say this as I’ve just had an Appeal. The very first thing we had to do was walk about 150 yards to get to the room itself ! Then because they were running late, we had to wait just over an hour and a half ! So in theory you could have failed the walking descriptor, and also, the sitting at a workstation for more than an hour descriptor !!!
Gordon you state "before needing to move away in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion"
When your in a small examination room, you can't just move away ?
I may get a surprise in the post from the Appeal Board, but after that experience I felt they just didn’t want to give anything away at all.
Pixie, Check my other post on DLA appeal...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Buckie
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Posts: 42
On my ESA Appeal, should I enclose the list of documents I want from the DM along with my Appeal Form ? Or, do you wait until your Appeal is accepted first before requesting those documents ?
Thanks in advance ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Buckie wrote: I have decided to Appeal my ESA Decision despite the previous DLA Appeal experience. As after a good nights sleep we have looked back on yesterdays events and came to the conclusion that the Appeal Board were stressed out after a hard long day as they were also running an hour and a half late, so have taken this as the excuse they were a bit more harsh on us, and going by posts in here Appeals appear to be a more relaxed experience than we encountered.
On my ESA Appeal, should I enclose the list of documents I want from the DM along with my Appeal Form ? Or, do you wait until your Appeal is accepted first before requesting those documents ?
Thanks in advance ...
Hi B,
You should submit your appeal, and request any documents as separate issues :
Appeal using GL24, (You can mention that you have requested documentation within the GL24, and will provide any relevant information when you receive them)
Requesting documentation using a SAR :
SAR :
www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/request-for-personal-information.rtf
From this page :
www.dwp.gov.uk/privacy-policy/data-protection/
The DM (Appeals Team) will deal with your GL24, The DWP Data Controller will deal with your SAR.
See this post from this afternoon :
www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/forum?view=top...d=10&id=97688#102638
bro58
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.