× Members

PIP Review Decision

More
4 days 22 hours ago #312464 by rae99
PIP Review Decision was created by rae99
Hi

I've had my first PIP review and received a decision within 10 days of sending it off for the same award (SC/ HM 4 yrs), exactly the same points as before (11 C 12M) My form clearly stated that my needs had increased and provided evidence.

My question is whether the review letter is meant to give reasons for the decision or is merely advisory as mine had no reasons given. It did say however that 'I have awarded you PIP for a longer time as your circumstances have changed' . This is untrue, they haven't awarded it for a longer time, so I don't understand what they're on about!

I know I can apply for a Mandatory Review - I won't do that as I'm very seriously ill and I couldn't manage, so I just wondered really if it's normal to not provide reasons for a decision which isn't presented as a 'no change' and make errors with times etc and if there's anything I can do about it apart from a MR?

Thanks :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 hour 59 minutes ago #312557 by BIS
Replied by BIS on topic PIP Review Decision
Hi rae99

I'm sorry to hear about your experience. Yes, unfortunately, it is quite common for them to make errors and not provide reasons for their decisions. If you had a paper-based decision, and it sounds as if you did, then there is no report to back up how they came to their decision.

I'm afraid - apart from an MR, there is nothing you can do. An MR is supposed to be submitted within a month of the date on the decision letter - but if you can't reach that deadline, and I understand you can't - you may want to do it later (if you feel able to) . You have another 12 months to submit a 'late mandatory reconsideration'. You would have to give an explanation why you didn't do it immediately, and you would say 'seriously ill'.

BIS

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonlatetrainBISCatherine12345ChrisDavidKeelyJasmine
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.