Therese Coffey was yesterday promoted to health secretary and deputy prime minister, leaving the DWP in the hands of former minister for disabled people, Chloe Smith.  Coffey leaves behind her a department even more dysfunctional and distrusted than the one she inherited.

At just one day short of three years, Coffey has been the longest serving secretary of state for work and pensions since Ian Duncan Smith, who managed almost six years, ending in March 2016.

Unlike IDS, however, Coffey brought no campaigning zeal for reform to the post.  Whilst that is probably just as well, what she did bring was as pernicious in its own way.

Under Coffey we have seen the DWP retreat into obsessive and pointless secrecy and an ugly determination to avoid paying benefits at every possible opportunity.

Her compulsive secrecy and the way it undermines trust was highlighted by the work and pensions committee’s ultimately failed attempt to get Coffey to release nine reports the DWP has refused to publish, sometimes even after saying they would.

The most notable of these avoidances may have been the refusal to pay the £20 universal credit uplift to legacy benefits claimants on the spurious grounds that the software couldn’t cope with the change.

But there have been many other occasions during Coffey’s tenure when the courts have found that the DWP has got the law wrong and claimants have been underpaid as a result.  On each occasion the response of the DWP has been to drag their feet and, when a LEAP exercise has been set up to identify underpaid claimants, repay only a tiny fraction of those who are eligible.

Only last week we reported on the DWP’s refusal to follow a recommendation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) to contact over 100,000 ESA claimants who are owed compensation totalling many millions for DWP errors.

Instead, claimants will have to somehow discover for themselves that they have been ripped-off and then figure out how to try to get what they are entitled to.

Standards of service at the DWP have also plummeted under Coffey.  PIP fresh claims are taking five months to process, PIP reviews are now so far behind that automatic 12 month extensions are being granted and trying to get through to the DWP on the telephone is now something that requires days of effort.

If Coffey takes the same determination to harm those she should be helping and to shroud every issue in secrecy to her new role, then the rest of the country will get a taste of the same misery that claimants have endured these last three years.

Meanwhile, Coffey’s replacement Chloe Smith was only appointed to the post of Minister for Disabled People, Health and Work in September 2021.  Born in 1982, she became the youngest sitting MP when she won her seat in 2009.

Her voting record on benefits is as might be expected.  She has never voted in favour of paying higher benefits to sick and disabled claimants and, when she has been present to vote, always voted for reductions in spending on welfare benefits.

In July of this year she committed herself to ‘urgently investigating’ alleged assessment tricks used by PIP and WCA assessors, after they were raised by MPs at a meeting of the work and pensions committee.

Unsurprisingly we have heard nothing more on the matter.

It seems unlikely that there will be any significant change it the way the DWP is run under the new secretary of state, though there will perhaps be rather less karaoke and booze on the premises.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    wibblum · 15 hours ago
    In preparation for this 'great adventure' I've done some research on my local Jobcentre (which has moved location since I last visited it). It's now in a building on a raised plaza with the only access to it being a long flight of steps. It's almost hilarious.

    I wonder if they'll let me off attending my work-focused interviews due to the fact that they effectively have no disabled access? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Richard · 17 hours ago
    Currently I pay ALL of my enhanced PIP for both mobility and personal care to employ a Personal assistant for 10-12 hours per week I have both severe mental ill health and multiple physical disabilities.
    I did pass Islington council's FACE assessment on several occasions,  but it actually worked out more expensive than employing my own PA. Also, they didn't even read the risk assessment that stated I have an ESA (Emotional support animal- a tiny French bulldog) the carer they sent couldn't work out how to do my budgeting, refused to enter my flat due to the dog,  and refused to take me shopping   The council even stated eventually that they only sub-contract for generic elderly care assistants which is unhelpful as I am 58 and don't require my bottom wiping.  The council then refunded me over £3000 for 3 months of this.

    My current PA is a 3rd year student nurse and gives a higher standard for everything I require,  her salary goes towards paying her high rent here in London for her and her husband.  If the changes to PIP occur I do not know what I will do. Often I even pay her overtime out of my Support group ESA. I do hope Labour get into power before these changes as it can't make the situation any worse.  Even the Clown Ian Duncan Smith resigned as DWP Secretary of State years back because he saw what the Tory changes were doing to long-term sick and disabled people.