The final version of the Universal Credit Bill (formerly the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill) has now been published on the parliament website.

A copy of the updated explanatory notes has also been published.

Immediately below the title of the new bill is the following note:

[The Speaker of the House of Commons has certified this Bill as a Money Bill within the meaning of the Parliament Act 1911.]

This confirms that the bill is a money bill and that, therefore, the Commons can ignore any amendments the Lords might attempt to make.

Readers can therefore assume that this is the final version of the bill which will come into force in April 2026.

You can download the final version of the bill and the explanatory notes from this page.

The version of the bill is “HL Bill 123 (as brought from the Commons)” – click on the Bill (4) link to get it.

The explanatory notes are “HL Bill 123 Explanatory Notes” – click on Explanatory Notes (3) to get them.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Of to the Lords it goes where we can hear from the likes of Lord Mackinlay former member of the DWP select committee. Who tells the media we are being taken for absolute fools. It is too easy for people to get the golden ticket of a lifetime on handouts. I have got four prosthetic limbs and I go to work every single day of the week. If I can do it, for heaven's sake, Britain, get off your backsides.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John Well said John. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @UC I think the post in question has been misunderstood by a lot of people on here going by the down votes. 

      The poster in question is referring to Craig Mackinlay(Google him) and is using his words. There are not the words of the poster. 

      As another poster has already said quotation marks would have clarified the issue but having said that I am surprised how very few people seem to know who he is given the importance of this matter. 




    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John Who goes out to work every day? Lord Mackinlay? I think I understand you John. I misunderstood the whole post. It's Lord Mackinlay who has four prosthetic limbs.  Had to look him up.  Thanks John. Well all I can say is good for you Lord Mackinlay!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @UC That is what Lord Mackinlay has said. As rtbcpart2 has pointed out I probably should have made that clear in my post.

      Looking at his record as a MP where his election involved breaching financial rules (he was acquitted at trial, one of his campaign activists was found guilty and got a suspended prison sentence). And Mackinlay's time as a MP where he was found to have breached rules on potential financial interest multiple times. The reason he was made a Lord appears to be that he became severely disabled when he was a MP. So in effect he was given a golden ticket of a lifetime of handouts for becoming disabled. And is now getting paid to be a Lord and to be the director of a anti net zero group, a job he would be unlikely to have if he was not a Lord. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @UC Hi UC I do NOT think John for one minute is being derogatory towards us, himself or the site he is just quoting what the likes of Lord Mackinley former member of the DWP select committee will start blurting out in the Lords! Due to the historic 'vitriol' from this Lord!

      This particular Lord is known for this type of rhetoric. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    They must also support new clause 8, which would ensure that changes from the Timms review are introduced as primary legislation. That is essential in ensuring democratic scrutiny - otherwise, MPs will not be able to amend or vote on the legislation.
    Nadia Whittome

    Bill Debate 9 July (4.45pm)

    Clause 8 didn’t pass - and this still seems useful information.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    The timings pip review that's coming late 2026 will it mean everyone on pip as to re apply for the new one I can't find mutch about it thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Wayne No I don't believe so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Wayne That would be being reassessed I have not seen that anywhere 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Wayne Unlikely.  Any changes will be brought in as reassessments naturally come around. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Wayne From what I can tell, any changes to PIP have been scrapped completely, but I'll wait for someone else to also clarify that!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    So if I'm right exsitng uc claimants only on LCWRA are still screwed just been delayed. The Government will ramp up reassessments to fail......

    Even the rebellion was brain wash letting this go through.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @David The DWP have restarted WCA reassessments but has a massive backlog and is focusing to start with on those whose conditions are likely to have improved. The government claims it is going to continue ramping up WCA reassessments and will do WCA reassessments right up to the day the WCA is abolished. Which seems stupid and cruel. As in theory someone on PIP and UC LCWRA could have a WCA and lose their LCWRA then the next week the WCA is abolished and they get UC health due to being on PIP daily living element. But are treated as new claimant because they lost LCWRA status for a week and as a result are worse off for life.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @David A poster on here mentioned that they were currently suspended and uploaded an internal DWP memo on here demonstrating that.

      No idea if it was genuine or not.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @GLB Have we had any news about the DWP ramping up reassessments for UC claimants in the LCWRA group? For a while the news we were hearing was that these claimants would not be re-assessed again after the end of 2025. Has that changed now for some reason?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @GLB What do you mean we're still screwed? Oh god I hope not.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @GLB Apart from a few brave legends who staunchly argued and voted against it throughout.  The handful of Labour MPs who actually had integrity.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    What makes this a money bill? 
    I thought there was still a question mark over that?
    Can we do ANYTHING  to get it changed? I've no real clue about these things. I can't make it stay in my head. I need to hear it from someone who can explain it in layman's terms if possible. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @The Dogmother No unfortunately I don't think there is anything we can do, not the lord's. They can suggest amendments to the bill but the government don't have to except them because it's a money bill. That is my understanding.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @The Dogmother If my health allows, I’m still going to write to any members of the Lords with an interest in disability.  Not that it’ll achieve anything (just like my emails and voicemails to my MP didn’t throughout the process), but I have to do something.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Very dissapointing to have it confirmed that it has been certified as a Money Bill; which I assume it's primary purpose is to save money (And avoid a wealth tax etc.).  Does it mean that this Bill can not be legally challenged?  I assume not.  This is a very sad day for disability rights.  The Government have used every procedural trick to rush this Bill through parliament so it did not have to face scrutiny or opposition.  Very sad to think that 336 so called 'Labour' MPs; including my own MP have voted for this to pass without consultaton or basic democratic oversight.  The pledges the Labour party made in their election manifesto of 2024 to champion disabled people's right and to put the views and voices of disabled people at the heart of everything they do broken.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Yorry Yes, it has been utterly shameful. Sadly, I think it will only get worse.

      This country has still a bit to go to fall completely into the gutter, but it's getting there. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon25 I feel the worst thing that has been done over the past 8 weeks is the campaign to vilify disabled people. Every news program I watch is painting us as scrounges & disgusting people. The hatred with the public is getting worse. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Dr Marie Tidball’s Amendment

    Timms’s helpful checklist
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    I thought It would get clearer after seeing it,but it really didn't, but I guess that's the idea.The ESA bit if your in the support group and the severe illnesses criteria will old claimants stay protected and it said constantly all the time and TiMMS said the other day in parliament it was the same as before, but safely reliably within reasonable time isn't the same as before did he lie again or am I confused between the 2 criteria. I apologise if I'm just not taking it in right but it's taking a toll my stress. Or maybe I'm paranoid that there slipping it in the backdoor, constantly slight of hand.I feel it will be a sad day.should it even be a money Bill if it's got severe illnesses criteria in it