There was little comfort for sick and disabled claimants from the Labour Party conference this week, as sections of shadow work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall’s speech would not have sounded out of place at last week’s Conservative conference

At both events, speakers decried the fact that two million people were currently receiving benefits as incapable of work and guaranteed that this would change.

Labour undertook to reform universal credit whilst the Conservatives promised to reform the work capability assessment.

Both promised a massive improvement in employment support.

And both asserted that work is good for more than just your financial wellbeing.

Most of all, both insisted that those who can work, must work.

Whilst many people could agree with most of those statements, the problem is that both parties have a long history of causing immense misery as they seek to distinguish those who can’t work from those who, in their view, can but won’t. 

And even more suffering as they impose penalties on the second group.

In her speech, Kendall told Labour delegates:

“Conference, Britain isn’t working. 

Over two million people shut out of the workplace because of sickness or disability, want to work.

The over 50s, especially women struggling with poor physical health and caring responsibilities.

Young people with mental health problems lacking basic qualifications, on the back foot before they’ve even begun. 

Under Labour, this will change.

Our top priority will be ensuring everyone who can work, does.

Because we believe the benefits of work go beyond a payslip.

And in the dignity and self-respect good work brings.

So we will tear down the barriers to success.

We’ll tackle the root causes of worklessness, recruiting thousands more mental health staff and overhauling skills.

So no-one is ever written off again, whatever their age.

We’ll transform employment support so it’s tailored to individual and local needs  . . .

This is our contract with the British people:  real opportunities, matched by the responsibility to take them up.” 

Kendall also told conference:

“We will reform universal credit to protect people when they need it and to genuinely make work pay. We’ll champion equality for disabled people.”

Compare Kendall’s words with speeches from last week’s Conservative conference.

The prime minister said:

“. . .our benefits system declares that more than two million people of working age are incapable of actually doing any.

it’s a tragedy for those two million people being written off.

I refuse to accept this and that is why we are going to change the rules so that those who can work, do work.”

Meanwhile, chancellor Jeremy Hunt told delegates:

“That safety net is paid from tax. And that social contract depends on fairness to those in work alongside compassion to those who are not.

That means work must pay… and we’re making sure it does.”

And work and pensions secretary, Mel Stride, explained:

“Having a job isn’t just good for your finances – it’s good for your mental and physical wellbeing too.

And it pains me to think there are so many people being left on benefits who want to work and who could be thriving in work. It’s a waste of human potential . . .

So we are reforming our sickness and disability benefit assessments for the first time in over a decade, to take account of the modern workplace.

That is going hand-in-hand with a revolution in the employment support we’re providing for people with health problems and disabilities.”

So, the message, it seems is much the same.  Perhaps the difference, if Labour gets in, will be in the delivery.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    robbie · 10 hours ago
    Support Group should be automatically migrated. Government want it, they should do it. All the more reason for it to be automatic if nothing changes, which also begs the question, why do it?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    The Dog Mother · 1 days ago
    With each passing day I'm more and more consumed with fear and dread over these proposals.
    Esp,for now, the forced migration from Esa to UC. The whole process has me terrified.
    I honestly don't know which way to turn for the best. I can find no way round it other than go through the changeover or don't. If I don't and I lose pip, if these other changes come in,as it's damn hard enough to get now, I couldn't even live on it as I get low rate both components.  
    Grateful as I am for it. But if that stopped too I'd be in stuck.Id have nothing to survive on. Like a lot of you on here. It really is panic stations. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Bob · 1 days ago
      @The Dog Mother It has people scared the whole process is stressful I don't have internet access at home so would need help with applying online maybe need to contact citizens advice.  Also people have told me that have already switched that it was a good six weeks before they sorted it. What do u live on in the meantime.  And if you are already in ESA support group do u have to have another dreaded assessment. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      M shirker · 1 days ago
      @The Dog Mother @Don’t worry I feel the same too its the weeks of no money the looming threat of sanctions the bullying work coach being monitored all the time just horrible although their is 800,000 people to get threw so it might not be until this time next year anyway I will probably stay on the lcwra as long as I can but in the end going to be forced into work at some point in the future I will just do 18 hours and by the time I do I will be late 50s anyway 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    A · 2 days ago
    Can we please list the disadvantages of migrating to UC?

    To me, the major one is having to do with a work coach. Even when you're in Support Group/LCWRA, they still annoy you, keep calling you, to check whether you're not abroad, or want to work, and ask you to meet with them periodically. In addition, since they're in charge of your case, as soon as you've reached the proposed time for you to have a reassessment, they'll contact to you and ask you to look for work, or get a sicknote and fill in ESA50 form, while when you're on ESA, time drags and you could be contacted for a reassessment years after the proposed time has elapsed, as no particular person is in charge of your file.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      agmlfc72 · 15 hours ago
      @Pete I may have shown them my Birth certificate too as I took that with me as well.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      agmlfc72 · 15 hours ago
      @Pete It isn't. I am in the LCWRA group and I voluntarily migrated in December 2022 (I was in IR-ESA Support Group) for the extra £100 a month and apart from an initial 5 minute interview at the Jobcentre about 10 days after applying to show them ID (Debit Card and previous recent letters from THEM to do with my old ESA claim) they have never hauled me in for a work focused interview.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The dogmother. · 1 days ago
      @Pete Thanks for that. Makes me feel a bit better.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Pete · 1 days ago
      @A In fact I actually know somoene in that group that has basically been treated like they were in the support group for ESA. 

      When they were asked to migrate, the DWP actually made a point of telling them nothing would change. Although granted I wouldn't trust he DWP
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Pete · 1 days ago
      @A I didn't think it was like that for those in the LCWRA group?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    wibblum · 3 days ago
    In preparation for this 'great adventure' I've done some research on my local Jobcentre (which has moved location since I last visited it). It's now in a building on a raised plaza with the only access to it being a long flight of steps. It's almost hilarious.

    I wonder if they'll let me off attending my work-focused interviews due to the fact that they effectively have no disabled access? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Richard · 3 days ago
    Currently I pay ALL of my enhanced PIP for both mobility and personal care to employ a Personal assistant for 10-12 hours per week I have both severe mental ill health and multiple physical disabilities.
    I did pass Islington council's FACE assessment on several occasions,  but it actually worked out more expensive than employing my own PA. Also, they didn't even read the risk assessment that stated I have an ESA (Emotional support animal- a tiny French bulldog) the carer they sent couldn't work out how to do my budgeting, refused to enter my flat due to the dog,  and refused to take me shopping   The council even stated eventually that they only sub-contract for generic elderly care assistants which is unhelpful as I am 58 and don't require my bottom wiping.  The council then refunded me over £3000 for 3 months of this.

    My current PA is a 3rd year student nurse and gives a higher standard for everything I require,  her salary goes towards paying her high rent here in London for her and her husband.  If the changes to PIP occur I do not know what I will do. Often I even pay her overtime out of my Support group ESA. I do hope Labour get into power before these changes as it can't make the situation any worse.  Even the Clown Ian Duncan Smith resigned as DWP Secretary of State years back because he saw what the Tory changes were doing to long-term sick and disabled people.