We will have to wait for the publication of the Green Paper later today for full details of changes to personal Independence payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC).

But here are some of the main points of the speech.

Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

  • No vouchers
  • No means-test
  • No freeze.

But, from November 2026, claimants will need to score at least 4 points from a single descriptor to qualify for the daily living component of PIP, as well as scoring a total of at least 8 points..

So, if you select 4 descriptors scoring two points each, that will be 8 points, but it will not qualify for an award. 

But if you select one descriptor scoring 4 points and two descriptors scoring 2 points, that will be 8 points and you will qualify for an award.

There will also be review of the PIP assessment system led by disability minister Stephen Timms.

PIP existing claimants

The DWP says it "will work with Department of Health and Social Care to ensure that existing people who claim PIP who may no longer be entitled to the benefit following an award review under new eligibility rules have their health and eligible care needs met. The government is consulting on how best to achieve this."

This suggests that existing claimants will be subject to the new rules when their award is reviewed, if the review takes place from November 2026 onwards..

 Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

The WCA is to be scrapped in 2028 and a new single assessment system introduced. Under the new system, any extra financial support for health conditions (including PIP, ESA or UC health) will be assessed via a new single assessment which will be based on the PIP assessment – considering on the impact of disability on daily living, not on capacity to work.

There will be an increase in  Face-to-Face Assessments for PIP and the WCA.

Reintroduce reassessments for incapacity benefits, with exceptions for those who will never work and those under special rules for end-of-life care. Reassessments have largely been switched off since 2021.

A "Right To Try Guarantee" will be introduced which will guarantee that attempting work will never lead to a benefits reassessment.

Universal Credit (UC)

From April 2026, Labour will hold the value of the universal credit health top-up fixed in cash terms for existing claimants, and reduce it for new claimants, with an additional premium for people with severe lifelong condition

The Standard Allowance will be raised above inflation by 2029/30, adding £775 annually in cash terms for a single person aged over 25.

Access to the health element of Universal Credit will be delayed until a claimant is aged 22.

Existing claimants.  The DWP say “Those currently in receipt of UC health will benefit from the increased standard allowance and will not be affected by plans to reduce UC health in future.”

Assessments

People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed.

When

The DWP say they will bring forward primary legislation this session to enable delivery of the PIP additional eligibility requirement and UC rebalancing reforms from 26/27.

The Right to Work Guarantee will be delivered through separate primary legislation which will be introduced “in due course”. 

Savings

The DWP say the changes are expected to save over £5 billion in 2029 to 2030.

Links

The Pathways to Work:  Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper.

 Liz Kendall speech

 You can try the proposed new PIP test here.

You can also:

keep up with what’s changing and when

find out what you can do if you are unhappy about Labour’s plans

follow the latest news about PIP and UC changes.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Honestly the thing that baffles me the most is the descriptor change. Making it so you have to score 4 points on at least 1 descriptor is the part that is really going to effect a lot of people, myself included. I score 14 points over all of them with the highest individual score being a 3 but if this comes into effect I lose entitlement because even though overall I get enough points because I don't score enough on a single descriptor. To score 4 points you need to receive assistance for whatever the descriptor is.

    They are basically changing it to say that unless you "receive assistance" for something you are not considered disabled enough.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @ruiner99 Not really as I use an aid or have assistance for toilet and shower as I suffer extreme spells of vertigo due to a brain tumour but that only scores a 2 so I'm also in the didn't score 4 group
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @ruiner99 Exactly.  I scored 10 points for DL and 22 for mobility.  But my DL score is 5 x 2 points.  I thought my DL score was too low at the time as I do need assistance but I was just so relieved the assessment was over I didn't challenge it.  So now not only will I lose DL my carer will lose their allowance so that help will be gone.  I am also on UC and that will be affected too.  So what am I supposed to do now?  I have a brain injury which will never improve and I am unable to work.  FYI I worked full-time from 16-40 till I became ill.  

      I agree with all the support of getting disabled back into work if they want to or want to try it.  But some of us are not able to work at all.  So why are we being targeted?  Reducing my eligibility will mean I cannot get the help I need or pay my bills.  

      Plus what about the disabled people that are already working and need their PIP to help them cover their costs?  So whilst trying their hardest to be independent and also paying into the system they'll have their PIP cut.

      Does Liz Kendall really think that by reducing eligibility it means that all of our disabilities disappear and we can jump out of bed and head off to the job Centre?  

      All of us know how awful a PIP assessment is.  The strain and worry it causes.  Plus I am sure there are many like me that should have been awarded more points for DL but sucked it up for the fear of going through it all again.  They only had to phone my GP and Neurosurgeon and they could explain easily my disability and how it affects my life.  Plus they are obviously medically qualified rather than the young girl that assessed me at home.  

      Good luck to everybody.  If you can please email your MP or anyone that could make a difference.  


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    What Liz Kendall is trying to do is take one (WCA) and raise the bar for the other one (PIP) and ensure disabled claimants are kicked out by not being qualified or entitled for either…. That’s a grant less to pay for a disabled individual while they can save money and scoot off on holidays . Is this truly fair and just?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    How about this idea?  Stop paying over 80s on the old State Pension the measly 25p per week upgrade and cancel the insulting £10 Christmas Bonus. Neither amount makes any real difference to the lives of the recipients and are ridiculed in the media every time they get mentioned. That would save a fortune and I really don't think that anyone would miss the money, unlike the Winter Fuel Payment; the government had no problem making that means tested.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Do people remember Osborne u turning on reforms because think this reform  will be watered down first after consultation then organizations will get it all overturned people must try hang on there are things that can be done this stuff is never ending this will go back to court labour are just trying to make bigger history so that it gives them credit if they get voted out even if they fail just hope if they don't get back in that the next party doesn't try this but alot worse if labour fails it will be come a competition to see who finally did it noone should play with disabled people's lives .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    He just found out that’s there’s another green paper to come out on pip alone they want to remove a lot of the original descriptors for daily living ie washing getting dressed and cooking ect so a new lot of descriptors are coming out which is why the government has stated you need 4 points on on descriptor. This government is definitely be losing my vote next parliament if this happens 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Iain Duncan Smith is seeming pretty benevolent today...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    My biggest concern is that reassessments are being increased again and now the criteria to receive benefits will be so much harder. It says that those with severe conditions will not be re-assessed by they give no definition of 'severe'. I understand personality disorder and schizophrenia is severe but I'm not sure if it covers depression even if this is severe depression.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @David " I understand personality disorder and schizophrenia is severe but I'm not sure if it covers depression even if this is severe depression."

      From what Liz Kendall said, I don't think it even covers personality disorder and schizophrenia. To them, no one with mental health issues would receive any sickness benefits or be exempted from searching for work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Thank you so much for your swift and clear post… I was relived after months of gut wrenching worry.  I can fight the assessments should I live to my next one in five years which is very doubtful .. so this is giving me a clearer path on what is already a difficult journey ..as it is with most on here. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    As a pensioner 3 years into a 10 year light touch review, does this mean my PIP is safe until 2032 or will it get reviewed in November 2026? Can someone tell me please

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Elspeth Graham My problem too - we have just been left in the dark completely
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Elspeth Graham I don't think anyone can answer that,there's not enough information 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Elspeth Graham This is my worry Im 4 years in to my 10 year, i cant find anything out about it 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    This is nothing to do with saving money, it's about trying to get voters back who are turning to Reform 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gawayn They aren't trying get Reform voters voting for them, they know that won't happen, it is completely pointless, they would have to do a lot more to get them to even consider changing. 

      Labour by doing this have lost a lot of their traditional voters and gained very few in return. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon Yeah yeah, but the point is, THEY think it will save over £5 billion. Whether it will in the long run is a different matte I agree, but that is clearly their agenda at the moment to cut costs and save money, these so called reforms are not designed to help us. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @MJ It won't save money in the long run though, will it? It's going to cost money to set up, more work coaches to pay for, more pressure on the department of health and social care, the list goes on.  There will be other knock on effects as well. People forced into work, who aren't well enough could become more unwell or a bigger strain on the NHS. Desperate people could turn to crime. There's lots of areas away from the DWP where costs will increase.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gawayn Reform are even worse, potentially 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon I think it is actually more a cost saving exercise dictated by the treasury and the PM. The economy is not doing as well as they thought, not helped by their poor budget. Defence spending is going up and £18 billion to Mauritius over the Chagos Islands which they didn't have to do. So cuts have to be made to cover extra spending. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Is pip daily living descriptiers being all changed or are they staying the same any ideals in this 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Diceman24 From what I've read they haven't decided yet and are going to look into it later. So not over yet. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The government has not addressed what will happen with the disability allowance awarded in pension credit, which is the equivalent of the severe disability premium in esa and awarded alongside any level of daily living component of pip. We're a long way from anything concrete with this back of an envelope green paper.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Please note this:

    On LBC Radio, Andrew Marr asked Liz Kendall about those claiming PIP because they are suffering with mental health problems.

    She said: “PIP was never set up to deal with these problems. PIP has always been a contribution towards the extra costs of living with a disability and that will absolutely remain, but PIP was never set up to deal with these problems."

    So, the question is: What's the point of assessing people with mental health issues on PIP if it was never set up to deal with mental health issues, as they said that the WCA will be scrapped and a new single assessment, which will be based on the PIP assessment, will be introduced?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Michael I don't see how they can remove all the mental health descriptors as that would go against the Equality Act 2010.  The Tories tried to do this and had to back down.  Ian DUncan Smith said the other day this would not work. They also tried to remove the social engagement question a year or two ago but had to back down on that after consultation.  They might think they can remove mental health questions but they have failed in the past.  Mind are also fighting really hard against this as they have posted on their website and Facebook page a few times now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Scorpion Unlawful and blatantly discriminatory is how that turned out the last time (I remember it well as I had to withdraw the mobility element of my appeal which was, unfortunately, one  day before the high court judgement)

      I'm not sure how the courts would go now, though. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Scorpion Because they'll probably chamge the descriptors as well as tightening eligibility and MH related questions will be slimmed down or removed entirely. 

      Its something we will have to wait on, I'm afraid.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Dont understand it. 

    If they are assessing your ability to work, based upon PIP, what happens to all the people in the support group under regulation 35, risk?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gallalayo They are not assessing your ability to work. The WCA will be scrapoed and to receive any disability element in UC, you will have to be awarded pip. It will be based on your ability to do tasks, as it is now - for the employmemt premium. Nothing will be related to work capability tasks.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    People need to do a response to the green paper even if it seems pointless because if theres non or a tiny bit of response it will go against it all being challenged in high court when it gets there  and then the government will think everyone agrees it does look pointless but still share what's thought and then let this get taken as far as it can because I think this is a tactic by government to make it look pointless so they can pass it through don't be doomed respond to it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Lill Thanks.  I will need lots of reminders, as I've put so much effort into the last one, that now it seams like totaly pointless thing.   As they never looked at it, as they didn't like the responses. .  But you are right!  Thank you!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    A windfall tax on the profits of Britain’s biggest banks would bring in £15bn for public spending. (Positive Money). 
    Britain’s ‘Big Four’ - Barclays, NatWest, Lloyds and HSBC - made £44.7bn profit in 2024. 
    This is more than four times the profit the Big Four made in 2020, and follows record profits of £44.3 billion last year. 
    Banks currently pay a special surcharge on profits, which was introduced after the last financial crisis in recognition of the risks banks’ activities pose to the wider economy, though the last Tory government slashed this surcharge by 60%, from 8% to 3%. 
     If the Bank Surcharge was raised to 35%, in line with the Energy Profits Levy on the windfall profits of oil and gas companies, the Treasury would receive an extra £14.8bn from the 2024 profits of these four banks alone. 
    Even just reversing the last government’s cuts to the Bank Surcharge and Bank Levy would bring in more than £3.5bn for the Exchequer (Positive Money estimates). 
    So next time a low life politician talks about kicking the disabled and seriously ill, tell them to TAX THE BANKS instead. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Fandango Yes I keep saying it.  The biggest problem with our country is inequality. 

      #taxtherich
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Fandango Spot on! This is nothing more than a wide sweeping hammer blow downwards on those who can least afford it. This all reads like a Tories wet dream! Nothing is being done to tax those that can more than afford it. All while bailing out Thames water to the tune of £3bn instead of taking it back into public hands. You couldnt make this stuff up!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I am a bit confused as I’m sure some people are. I got full pip for an indefinite time back in 2018. So I assume 2028 will be a light touch review. I got 12 points. Does this mean that I will be called for review before that date? Are people on an indefinite award being reassessed? I don’t claim any other benefits so I’m just not sure what’s going on. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Sarah B
      They are currently 5 years behind with reviews.
      People put on a 1 year review, 5 years ago, have not yet been reviewed.

      So... if you 10 year review is due in 5 years time, you'll prolly be reassessed then. Not likely they can catch up that quickly.

      Also there is a chance the 7% on 10-year awards MAY be left alone...  a possibilty !
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Sarah B The consensus is everybody is going to be reassessed. Labour will be ramping up reassessments.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Well I guess I will lose out all round I lost daily living on PIP at my last review and only now get enhanced mobilty due to uncontrolled seizures, my review ironically is due next november, I have no idea if I will retain that or not.  But my bigger concern is that I get old style contribution ESA based on my NIC contributions made whilst working for 20 years, but I have savings which I expect will exclude me from any help even with possible NS ESA I see me ending up with no job centre help such as it may be and then just be left to run through my savings and when can we expect this to happen as well.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Elizabeth Vidler I'm in the same boat
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Frank ish Job seekers allowance ( not observers) silly auto correct. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Frank ish I believe she means they are combining NS Esa ( contributions) with observers allowance to create a ' new time limited contribution based insurance' paid at a higher rate than current basic rate.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Elizabeth Vidler That's just ridiculous. My uncle has uncontrolled seizures and I know it affects every aspect of daily living. Yet they and the press make it sound as though they are just making sure people aren't shirking! I know how I feel after a faint where I blackout let alone a seizure! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Elizabeth Vidler My first year under the old style esa I was put in the middle group, which meant after the 1st year I was moved from contributory esa to income related even though I worked and paid NI payments all my working life! I do not trust our politicians and they can change the rules anytime when they please treating us all like playthings. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    First it was the winter fuel allowance for the elderly then it was the farmers now its us, you would think we are living under the Tories. I let the scare stories get to me usually bounces off, i have the joy of 2 migrations one from esa support group to UC and from dla to pip hardly filled with pleasure at the thought but will plough through, just hope that people more savvy with the law rip this dreadful green paper to shreds no point contacting my mp hes a starmer brown nose and never answers his emails.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    What I don’t understand is if you don’t get enough points in the daily living part of pip would you lose the moving around part of pip has well or not how would this work any answers would be good thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Arthritic Annie But not for a higher rate of UC? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Diceman24 No, you wouldn't lose mobility. This remains the same.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Diceman24 Dosent seem like it, seems you could still qualify for one without then other.