Many amendments have been tabled for the third reading of the Universal Credit and Personal independence Payment Bill.  There are now 18 pages of detailed amendments,  some on behalf of the government and some on behalf of those opposing the bill.

Below are a selection of the amendments. 

4-point rule

Government amendment (Gov 4) removes clause 5 – the PIP 4 point rule – from the bill.  If this is accepted (which it will be) it will be the end of the 4-point rule, unless it is resurrected in the Timms review which seems unlikely.

UC freeze

A new clause put forward by the government (Gov NC1) provides for the freeze to the universal health element not to apply to existing claimant, people who meet the severe conditions criteria and terminally ill patients.  This was one of the government’s earlier concessions to the rebels.

Name

Even the name of the bill is now subject to a government amendment (Gov 5), which would remove the words “and personal independence payment” from the title of the bill.  If the amendment passes, the bill will be the Universal Credit Bill.

Severe conditions criteria

Labour MP Graeme Downie has tabled an amendment (17) which relates to an issue that Benefits and Work has been highlighting.  The severe conditions criteria (SCC) as currently written require claimants to prove they meet the SCC “constantly”

Constantly is defined in the Bill as “at all times” or “on all occasions on which the claimant undertakes or attempts to undertake the activity”.

However, many degenerative conditions such as Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis and muscular dystrophy follow a slow path of decreasing ability, with periods of remission.  

At present, the bill would prevent people in these circumstances getting the higher payments and freedom from reassessment that the SCC provide, long after it is certain they will never work again.

The amendment would allow for the SCC to apply to claimants who have fluctuating conditions, such as Parkinson’s or multiple sclerosis.

Private doctors

An amendment (33) by SNP MP Kirsty Blackman, removes the requirement that, for the severe conditions criteria (SCC), a diagnosis must have been made by a health professional providing NHS services.  Many people are forced to resort to a private diagnosis because the NHS waiting list for an assessment for their condition is years long.  As the bill stands, having a private diagnosis only, appears to bar claimants from the SCC.

Date of UC cuts

An amendment (19) brought forward by work and pensions committee chair Debbie Abrahams, changes the date on which the universal credit cuts start, from April 2026 to November 2026.

More reports

A proposed new clause by LibDem MP Steve Darling would prevent most of the Bill coming into force until a range of reports and consultations had been completed.

What happens next

In a likely chaotic session on 9 July, these amendments – or as many as there are time for -will be considered by a committee of the whole House and voted on before a final vote on the whole bill, as amended, takes place.

The Speaker will make a decision on whether the Bill will be certified as a money bill only after all the amendments that are agreed have been included in the bill and it is now in its final form.

If it passes the commons, the bill will then be sent to the House of Lords. However, if it is certified asa money bill then the Lords will have no power to oblige the Commons to consider any amendments they suggest and the bill will automatically become law after a month.

You can download the latest amendments from a link on this page.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Looking forward to it, the Little Ugly Bill.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    If the bill includes clauses on severe conditions eligibility, then it can't be a money bill, can it?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Wow they really going to sort all this out in one day of committee meetings, that's going to be interesting. Hopefully it's not a private thing and we can choose to watch. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I am very concerned that this may be passed as a money bill. Plus I don't trust that they wont go back on changes in the Timms review. As we all know, these are a sneaky lot. I am afraid I still don't feel very optimistic about this. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    The proposed severe criteria conditions amendments so far still do not match the current UC severe criteria do not reassess which applies to all who will meet LCWRA for the rest of their life. As the bill if amended would still exclude those who will always meet LCWRA due to schedule 9 substantial risk.

    This is very concerning as substantial risk are the very group likely to come to most harm if endlessly reassessed and if required to engage with DWP work coaches and be subject to conditionality and sanctions. People will end up in hospital or dead if the bill is not amended to protect them.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Radionoush *typo correction: I meant MY condition fluctuates not MH condition fluctuates 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @john Also, I have an extremely severe neurological condition which means I haven’t been able to work for over twenty years and am mainly bedbound.  However, as well as steadily worsening over the years, mh condition fluctuates unpredictability from day to day and even hour to hour.  I might be able to do some of the SCC things at some point in the day, but not at others, or not be able to do them at all that day.  So it’s not just conditions like MS etc.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @john You aren't wrong, I've never been able to work and when I tried twenty years ago I had a total breakdown. No way I'll ever be able to work again safely yet I'm always under threat of reassessment and rule changes.( Not to mention the constant retoric that people like me are scroungers, not really ill and  that work would magically cure us)  That's what happens when you are mentally ill and on benefits. 
      And they say this is the easy option, living in constant fear that everything will be taken away isn't any life anyone would choose

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact