Warning: this article includes repeated references to self-harm and suicide

The proposed changes to the PIP scoring system will affect many claimants living with severe mental illness (SMI) and some have already experienced a deterioration in their health, a Benefits and Work survey suggests.

Labour intends to remove the daily living component from claimants who do not score 4 points or higher for at least one activity, when their PIP award is reviewed from November 2026,

DWP disability minister Stephen Timms said that claimants who will lose their PIP daily living have “multiple but low-level functional needs across several activities. These could individually be managed with small interventions or the addition of aids or appliances. This change will focus PIP more on those with the greatest needs. . .”

However, a survey completed by almost 550 Benefits and Work readers who do not score 4 points  has shown that many of those who will lose their award are living with SMI, including bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and personality disorders.

Current distress

The publication of the Green Paper has already caused distress amongst some of this group of claimants.

Shakk66, [no real names were used by participants], aged 43, lives with unstable borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder. They told us that they “struggle understanding the world and understanding what people mean .I'm vulnerable to abuse because I don't understand what's going in i hear voices in my kitchen and I feel like I'm being spied on all the time . . . i tried volunteering and it sent me off the deep end after being unable to volunteer and hearing about the pip changes i tried to kill myself with tablets and now I've got permanent stomach damage.”

Paul, aged 30-40, lives with bipolar disorder and says “During manic episodes I always end up being hospitalised. I have been trying to get part time work for over 6 months and have not been successful. . . This green paper has caused me extreme anxiety and has prompted suicidal thoughts.”

Dee, aged 43 lives with emotionally unstable personality disorder.  They explained that  “I struggle with going out and being around people (other than my parents) more than once a week without extreme psychological distress. . . My mental health has worsened since the announcement in March and I feel very fearful of the future with little hope and serious thoughts of ending my life.”

Lilly, aged 33, lives with schizophrenia and says they “can not communicate with others due to the extreme paranoia I experience every day.”  They expect to lose £5,000 a year if the cuts go through “This will be catastrophic for me I will loose all sense of independence. My mom is my only carer and as she gets older I’m aware that once she is gone I will be all alone. . . I feel suicidal at the prospect of these changes and my symptoms are worsening. . .”

Future fears

Other claimants living with SMI also fear what the future holds.

Daz, aged 42, lives with schizophrenia. They say “if wasn’t for my carer I would spend all my income in the first three days of receiving it (which is solely from UC and PIP). Prior to my carer helping me 5 years ago I ended up homeless and couch surfing then ended up in hospital after being sectioned. . . My carer will lose her Carer’s Allowance then this will mean she has to get a full time job and no longer be able to care for me. I will no longer be able to afford all my rent, bills and very little food. I will end up losing my home and end up back in mental hospital”

Sweet-Night, aged 32, lives with schizophrenia, depression and anxiety. They told us “Speaking with others is difficult due to my schizophrenia and my relationships with others can become volatile, harmful and unpredictable. I'm also not able to manage the motivation required to care for myself, to maintain my health, hygiene, and appearance. I don't know how i would be able to maintain a job or who would hire me.”

Sheepdog, aged 60 plus, lives with borderline personality disorder. schizophrenia and arthritis.  They say that if they lost their PIP “I would not be able to pay for my careres. . . If I lose my care people. I would struggle to cope by myself.”

Anon, aged 53, lives with bipolar disorder and psychosis.  They say that if the Green Paper cuts happen  “I would have only £100 approx left for going out including bus fares. Clothes etc would need to come out of that too. In other words I would become isolated and my mental health would be at rock bottom.. . I have tried volunteering but still ended up in hospital. I I am disabled and over 50 and know the reality is that younger fitter people are chosen by employers in most cases.”

Kevin, aged 54, lives with bipolar disorder and psychosis. He considers that if the PIP cuts were imposed he would become homeless.  He says that if he had to try moving into work, “With how serious my bipolar disorder, psychosis and extreme anxiety not only Will this effect me mentally and I can become violent when manic or paranoid psychotic I will be a danger to others or myself as I would be suicidal. Physically my condition causes extreme stomach problems to the point of I can’t leave the house for fear of having accidents. I will definitely consider suicide as an option as I would not be able to survive.”

Lack of openness

Approximately 30 people out of the 550 who completed our survey said they lived with SMI but did not score any 4 point or higher descriptors. 

In part, this is because there are fewer opportunities to score 4 points or more for supervision than there are for needing actual help with an activity.  And in part it is because assessments of are often carried out by health professionals with very limited understanding of SMI and so they fail to award the appropriate points.

But our survey is a tiny sample, a fraction of one percent of the total number of PIP claimants.

There are almost 240,000 PIP claimants who live with SMI. It is likely that many thousands of them are at risk of losing their PIP daily living. 

The DWP know precisely how many people with every health condition currently fail to score any 4 point or higher descriptors, but they will not publish that information.

This lack of openness allows Timms to get away with his claim that only those with low-level functional needs face losing their PIP.

It allows Liz Kendall to argue that too many on benefits are taking the mickey whilst ignoring those whose lives depend on PIP.

Rachel Reeves was asked by the treasury committee on 2 April 2025 “Are you quite confident, then, that everybody who ends up dropping out of the [PIP] eligibility criteria has the potential to work and that you will be able to get them into work?”

The same lack of openness meant that instead of answering with honesty, “Of course not” she could get away with “We know that there are hundreds of thousands of people with a disability who want to work, and there are many people with disabilities who already do work.”

What you can do

If, due to being misled, MPs vote in favour of the Green Paper changes it will mean disaster for large numbers of claimants.  From November 2026 until after the next general election at least 10,000 claimants every month will lose their PIP.  This will include many living with SMI.

Please draw the attention of your MP to this issue.  

Ask them to ask the secretary of state for work and pensions to publish a breakdown by health condition detailing how many claimants get the PIP care component without scoring 4 points or higher.

Finally

Amongst the other people living with SMI who completed our survey was a claimant who says that they have scars from self-harm in places they can’t cover up including their hands and face, a claimant who thinks the devil is in their shower water so needs someone to calm them whilst they wash and a claimant who has been detained “many, many” times under section 136 of the mental health act for running in front of cars.

These are all people who will lose their PIP in order to maintain Rachel Reeves fiscal rules.

People living with SMI already have a life expectancy 15-20 years shorter than the general population. So, why take money from individuals with such enormous challenges in their lives, rather than say, millionaires or tax avoiding multinationals?

Maybe you could ask your MP their opinion about that too?

You can read more about how we carried out our survey here

You can search our survey results by keyword, including health conditions and you or your organisation is welcome to carry out your own research using the survey results.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    I have SMI. Diagnosed me with paranoid skitzophrina and OCD in 2017 in phyc ward. Throughout the years of being mostly in, and out of hospital I did not want to believe this as they're now saying on 2024 I have been misdiagnosed. What hurts the most is having the Drs tell me and my family that if I don't believe in the diagnosis then I'm the problem. Turns out I have autism and ADHD. In 10years of trying anti depression tablets and anti phycotic. I can safely say the ADHD medication is the only meds that actually helped me.(When in phycosis thats the only time anti phycosis medication worked) Other than that getting the depot is still a let down due to side effects .Its a struggle to get to know how the brain and body works, when the doctors themselves are always learning. I myself would like to work however the prospects of that does not seem plausible I am unstable and still healing. I feel alone and not connected with society. I am vulnerable and I hate to admit that. However being vulnerable and not seeing what others see or hear has made me put trust in the wrong people and has landed me in situations I wish I could learn more.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    I use aids because I have had three heart attacks and am now diabetic and literally on many medications some of which are pain killers, and others for heart, diabetes and I am disabled due to a child hood accident. All of these have contributed to my becoming severely depressed and every day is a a challenge to just get up and live. I need help getting my laundry sorted, help with cooking as it is not safe, and help with bathing which I manage once a week with help getting in and out of a shower. There are incontinence issues as well as bowel issues due to the many medications I am on and yet the powers that be think of me as being able to work. It was my incontinence that got me fired from my last job even after the heart attacks which I tried in order to keep up payments with my mortgage for my home which I eventually lost because I was no longer able to work. My doctor advised me to stop trying or else I would be dead so how do medically unqualified politicians decide I am fit.

    35% of my heart is in fact dead, and I have sluggish blood flow and end up having to manage pain plus drowsiness due to medications and diabetes and being out of breath and my HDL levels are low so they increase my chances of a 4th heart attack from which I may never recover.

    I find it very insulting and patronising to say the least that at my age of 64 with heart disease and an out of control blood sugar levels as well as the danger of a heart attack as I have issues with my HDL Cholesterol (The cholesterol that protects from heart attacks) and beta blockers when my heart risk scores are off the charts. What is wrong with this crowd of politicians who say they care on one hand and then shaft us on the other ? Where are there moral compass ? What makes them such experts ? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @James Dear James, I. Am so sorry to read of your sufferings.All Governments should hang their heads in shame. I totally agree with you, we don’t need cruel judgement we the sick and disabled need support care and understanding. Not added stress.👍🤗
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Again surely there will be some sort of legal action against the legislation Labour intends to bring to the vote aka the Cuts and the PIP 4 points. 

    Labour do not want to consult on the cuts but they want to consult on the Green Paper which obviously will face legal action and so the Green Paper will get watered down but the initial cuts will still take place leaving people on LCWRA/PIP losing both and finding themselves on the just the standard rate of UC, will LCW exist after the Work Capability Assessment gets abolished?

    This is NOT about helping disabled people find work, it is about cutting money, that is all because if it was about helping disabled people find work they wouldn't be scaling back access to work would they?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago

    Scathing, at least some have morals and principles they stand by.  Some see and are spelling out the truth about this Labour party!

    Good on you Mish!!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Mick I felt empowered reading that.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    This is a devastating article, although we do have a more positive one this morning in the Guardian as KeepingitReal  has already posted. 

    For those keeping up to date with my letter to Stephen Timms, it has now had over 27,000 views on X, and close to 900 reposts in less than 24 hours!  TheCanary are planning to publish it on their site, too.   No reply from the govt, of course.

    Apologies to those who sought out my intended "catch all" disabled news account on X for being so quiet, but things with the letter kind of sapped my time.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Not to mention those on lcwra who haven't claimed pip who have what some people keep referring to as the 'less serious mental illnesses' like major depressive disorder and general anxiety disorder. I know this has sent me spiralling. I'm also now regularly self harming and had a psychiatrist increase my multiple medications. If this goes through I know I won't cope, I've tried volunteering one afternoon a week and I was getting so stressed out I stopped eating it was awful. 
    This whole thing has set me back years
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Thank you Benefits and Work team.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Thank you
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Whole post

    Oh, hello:

    https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/apr/14/electoral-wake-up-call-dozens-of-labour-mps-risk-losing-majorities-over-welfare-cuts&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjNyP6Lj9eMAxWaSEEAHWFLEbgQ0PADegQIARAH&usg=AOvVaw2b6P8B-rj_DPQPWpcZVRMl

    The bits I like are this:

    "The analysis suggests almost 200 Labour MPs have a majority smaller than the number of recipients of personal independent payments in their constituencies – a significant number in northern England “red wall” seats."

    and this:

    "MPs are also warning that family members of claimants are also likely to be affected significantly or feel very strongly about the cuts – meaning the ripple effect could be much greater."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Anniesmum It's probably the only reason that they will!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @keepingitreal This is an underestimate too I think, as LCWRA and ESA groups are larger and they will lose out too. Labour are in a different position than the Tories were with disability cuts because disabled people represent a large portion of their own base. We have a chance to pressure them to have a big rethink. Some hope!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @keepingitreal Maybe they will sit up and start noticing now if it will directly affect them! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    This is heartbreaking! I feel Mind need to know about this as it’s discrimination at the very least! Is this private just for on here or can members of the public/Mps see this too? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Anniesmum Anyone can see if they know to google Benefits and Work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 months ago
    Thank you B&W. These proposals are OBSCENE.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Gingin Need to march to Downing Street.
      Put the politicians to shame.
      Nothing Downing Street hates more than wheelchair users and claimants hobbling on crutches.
      I would go, even on my crutches.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.