Benefits and Work has created an online form to allow claimants to assess themselves using the heavily reduced work capability assessment (WCA) that will be introduced if the DWP goes through with the harshest options in its recent consultation document.  

Activities abolished
The DWP are currently consulting on making it much harder to be found to have Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA or support group in ESA) or Limited Capability for Work (LCW). 

The consultation has various options, but at its most irresponsible, it proposes completely doing away with any points relating to:

  • Mobilising
  • Absence or loss of bowel/bladder control
  • Coping with Social Engagement
  • Getting About

The justification for this by the DWP is that people can now work from home, so problems with issues like mobilising, remaining continent or coping with other people no longer matter.

How easy it is in the real world for people with very serious health conditions to get jobs where their employer never expects them to come to work is something the consultation document simply doesn’t discuss. 

Substantial risk
Equally alarmingly, the DWP are proposing to do away with the absolutely vital substantial risk rule.  This rule allows you to be found to have LCWRA if there would be a substantial risk to the mental or physical health of anyone if you were found not to have LCWRA.

It is a fundamental safeguard for people who have, for example, severe mental health issues or some forms of learning disability or neurodiversity, who may struggle to regulate their emotions if placed in situations they find distressing.  They may harm themselves or lash out at others because they feel threatened or overwhelmed.

Under the proposed new rules, people in this position would, at best, be found to have LCW.  They could be required to attend interviews with work coaches and to take part in training.  If they failed to attend, or were judged not to have participated fully, they would then risk having their benefits sanctioned, possibly repeatedly.

What is likely to follow such sanctions is a descent into debt, increasing desperation and, as we have seen too often in the past, the end result may be the entirely avoidable death of a claimant.

According to Guy Opperman, minister for employment, work coaches receive just 6 hours and 45 minutes of mental health training.  With the benefit of this training they must judge whether a claimant is choosing to be uncooperative and even apparently rude or aggressive or is prevented from participating appropriately due to their their mental health condition.

The consultation document states that 14.6% of all new claimants who are placed in the LCWRA group are there because of the substantial risk rule.  There are currently a total of 2.4 million people in the LCWRA group of UC or support group of ESA. 

If these changes are brought in they are likely to apply to all new claimants from some point in 2025 and to all existing UC and ESA claimants who have their claim reviewed after that date.  (In addition, the DWP are still proposing to abolish the WCA entirely for new claims by 2029 and existing claims after that).

Many tens of thousands of claimants will be affected and it is very hard to see how removing the substantial risk rule would not lead to many additional claimant deaths.

Try the Worst Case WCA Test
Our WCA test is anonymous, though you can include your email address if you wish to emailed a copy of your results.  The results page will tell you how many points, if any, you scored and whether you would be placed in the:

  • LCWRA group
  • LCW group
  • Fit For Work group

Bear in mind that this is your assessment of what you would score, the DWP might reach a different conclusion.

In addition, remember this test may never be introduced.  Much may depend on the level of negative feedback and concern that these proposals create.

so, if you are unhappy with what you find when you try the test, we urge you very strongly to take action before it’s too late.

There’s details of steps you can take on the results page of your test.

Disability charities
If you have connections with a disability charity whose users may be affected, ask them to submit a response.  It doesn’t have to be very long and if they are worried that they don’t have a good enough understanding of the WCA, tell them about our absolutely free, confidential email consultancy service to help them with their submission.

Whilst individual submissions to the consultation can be anonymous and individuals’ details are always kept confidential, the DWP often publish a list of the organisations that have taken part.  It would be good to see as many disability charities as possible in that list.

But time is, deliberately, short.  The DWP gave no warning whatsoever that they were dropping this bombshell and have allowed only until 30 October for responses. 

So please begin alerting people as quickly and widely as you can.

And, finally, if you take the test, please come back and post a comment about how you got on and what actions you are planning to take.

Warning:  Please do not take the test if you think you would find the results distressing.  You can still find out more and take part in the consultation by reading our article:  Consultation on slashing support group launched by DWP

Take the Worst Case WCA Test

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Kali · 7 months ago
    Although my self assessment still just about keeps me in LCWRA - past experience and  summons to 3 different tribunals between 2013 znd 2019 show that the assessors initially find otherwise.
    **The tribunals service with a lot of help from this website and the CAB have always found in my favour and at my last one in 2019 they even awarded me 12.mobility points.
    My arms and legs work and I am not incontinent. 
    I have anxiety and depression related to a severe but very unusual phobia. (Tokophobia. - dll things pregnancy related)
    I am also one of the many middle-aged women to have received an autism (ASD/ASC) diagnosis.
    I do need to be reminded to eat and drink.  1 cup of coffee can take 4 hours and 6 trips to the microwave to finish.
    I am borderline agoraphobic because of my initial phobia and ideally should be accompanied when I go out. Meeting exoectant women triggers a panic attack/ shutdown/ meltdown and what is deemed "inappropriate behaviour "

    I am due for reassessment again next year and I am dreading it! And that is before they talk about moving the goalposts!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Gary Pritchard · 7 months ago
    just done the test which does not take into consideration having a limb missing as in 1 arm, yes you can feed yourself but who opens the food? living with chronic pain having no  or major loss of feeling in a limb, being hazardous as if you cut that area you bleed without knowing, break times at work approx 30 mins, takes 5 min to get to canteen 5 min back, but if you have COPD might take you 15-20 min to get to the canteen, i think the test is very vague in certain areas and the questions are not asked fairly, 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Gary Pritchard · 7 months ago
    Just a point of note, Most front line staff have never heard of LCWRA, and those who have say under company policy you are not entitled to it unless you have a note from your doctor stating you have less then 6 months to live, and this includes manager/manageress,  when you ask about it you are told, look on the web page at whats available and if you think your entitled then apply, but LWRCA is not on that page, when you apply for JSA/ESA you are told that it is being incorporated into universal credit and if entitled you will receive it, and they are not taking anymore applicants.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Watt Tyler · 7 months ago
    The WCA is to be scrapped right?

    So WHAT criteria would be used in assessing claimants?

    The WCA is a TOTAL failure that has feathered the nests of DWP for far too long :why not just SCRAP PIP seeing as though the criteria for claiming it will become so opaque as to making it pointless to have in the first place?

    These proposals are hot on the heels of being told last year that legacy claimants would only be moved onto UC in 2028-9 onwards so I can take it this is a Red Rag to satisfy Tory voters out there and after hearing what Suella Braverman had to say about human rights yesterday these latest DWP shenanigans are edited from the same well thumbed foolscap pad  of bigoted & prejudiced inhumanity that passes for Tory thought.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Peter. · 7 months ago
      @frmarcus Rachel Reeves is a Tory, same as Blair was. Buy To Let rose 30 fold under Blair, (in part, because Browns raid on pensions, led to the cessation of final salary pension schemes, and people began buying BTL, the smaller houses, which used to be typically bought by FTBs) and Reeves has said many times that she wants to bail out the BTL crowd.
      New Labour are Tories. Theyre both utterly horrific.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      frmarcus · 7 months ago
      @Watt Tyler I'd be careful about the party political point you make, ensuring first what Lab is offering - and don't hold your breath!  The Shad Chanc (Reeves) has already failed to commit to pensioners re triple-lock as potentially 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    J.M. Hunt · 7 months ago
    The expected re-assessment parameters show no practical understanding of people’s challenges for daily living.  The parameters reflect theoretical spreadsheet money saving plans. Reality is needed to avoid serious consequences for people with daily living challenges.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jude · 7 months ago
    This government are persecuting disabled people, how is that allowed? It is dangerous and an obvious risk to life - the disabled themselves as well as the general public. Removing the significant harm element is cruel and totally irresponsible 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Caz · 7 months ago
    I’ve been in the support group for 10yrs, I have multiple long term chronic & degenerative health conditions, alongside mental health issues. It absolutely astounds me that according to this test, I would be put back in the LCW. Yet again, those of us who are genuinely unable to work are being railroaded by the DWP. It’s disgraceful and immoral.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Angie · 7 months ago
      @Caz Ditto to the multiple chronic and degenerative conditions, been in Support group from the start (and exempt from assessments for IB as I got the highest rates of DLA) but if this happens I not only lose LCWRA status, I would actually be fit for work. I'm considering giving up the daily struggle to manage without help so that by the time they assess me I'll be much, much worse. And by rights, I should be getting my pension now not still jumping through DWP hoops.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    vvvv · 7 months ago
    This completely fails to capture the energy-limiting disabilities caused by ME/CFS. Someone could be classed Severely disabled by ME/CFS and yet score zero. The can/cannot options don't work for someone who might be able to do something once (raise arms above head) but then has to rest horizontally for the next 12 hours to recover or they will go into PEM and deteriorate. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    axwy62 · 7 months ago
    As I expected, though I currently meet 3 LCWRA descriptors, the worst case test means I would be found fit for work. How can someone who has to use a power chair, who is entirely incontinent and is 100% agoraphobic possibly be considered fit for work only because I have worked very hard to maintain some independence so I can transfer from powerchair to seat without assistance etc. I wish I hadn't bothered now.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    John · 7 months ago
    What about people who don’t get ESA and work and also get pip will these changes affect people like me I work part time and get pip I don’t get ESA or universal credit I’m very worried
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      D · 7 months ago
      @Star To be honest with you I have the same question too

      For example universal credit combined a number of benefits together so now to get housing benefit/lha you need to apply for the whole surbang of universal credit and sign it’s claimant commitment rather than just housing benefit and esa/jsa being separate benefits (the dwp would probably save a lot if they gave the option to apply for single benefits again)

      If pip and uc wca are merged then is there the possibility you won’t be all to claim pip without a uc award (though as pip is often an in work benefit on paper it shouldn’t…………..the dwp will find a lot of the disabled having to quit their full time jobs if they try and pull that one - it would be self sabotage)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Sophie · 7 months ago
      @John No these proposals should not affect you, they are not proposing changes to PIP itself, the proposals are for the work capability assessment for ESA/Universal Credit and to consider merging the assessments for people who do get both 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Star · 7 months ago
      @John I’d like to know the same.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    den1mon · 7 months ago
    Well I scored 57 points and elegible for lcwra
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    D · 7 months ago
    I looked up the results of past consultations from the dwp concerning disabilities and a report of the consultation results usually aren’t published till 3-4 months after the consultation ends.

    In theory that means the earliest these reforms could be at the beginning of the 2024 financial year at April 1st (announced in march 2024 budget)

    However I just got a bad feeling this will be rushed through as Tory red meat in the nov 22nd upcoming budget (if this happened I’d be 99% sure this consultation is only for show and they’d already made a decision - which only huge public backlash could of u-turned……but sadly crickets)

    I really hope I’m wrong and the date ‘given’ of 2025 (after the election) happens

    But you got sunak trying to make his mark on several things at lightspeed and with little thought and Mel stride trying to advertise for new work coaches via ‘The Sun’ of all media - these are the actions of politicians that intend to rush things through I fear
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    tom · 7 months ago
    i scored NIL  i currently am on ESA  SG and get PIP  Mobility ER
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    bill cocks · 7 months ago
    There will be consequences to this.
    And there will be uproar and vicious  kickback on those who are driven to physical violence becsuse of their mental condition being pushed over the edge by these grotesque proposals. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    carpetfactory · 7 months ago
    This is quite distressing but important too. Please, can someone give some me some concrete suggestions on what I can do to help pressurise the DWP to avoid making this change? Are there protests planned? Is there a mechanism that would let me object to the plan?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      D · 7 months ago
      @carpetfactory Mostly charities are using the line that it will probably never happen/the courts will stop it before it gets going.

      Problem is since sunak taken charge his ministers have been bypassing parliament and the courts a lot

      But it is crickets for the most part (I really hope that the major disability charities are working on something behind the scenes) - even some sort of crowdfunding for a future human rights case could be a possible idea (if each disabled person donated £1 that would amass a few mil kitty in theory)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      fibrofred · 7 months ago
      @carpetfactory It truly is scary and like you I would like to object in any way possible. It's interesting that they are giving such little time to comment & there are also only 5 consultation dates. I'm from Northern Ireland and there isn't even one planned here. I'm just encouraging everyone I can to send back the form on the link below.



      The problem is, nearly everyone I've spoken to hasn't even heard that these proposals are happening!! Best of luck!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    JC · 7 months ago
    "They could be required to attend interviews with work coaches and to take part in training."

    Are disabled claimants not protected from sanctions in this context under the Equality Act 2010? That is to say, if they can't comply because of their disability, the DWP must offer an alternative (or no) requirement. This is especially relevant for Avtivity 16 (coping with social engagement).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    fibrofred · 7 months ago
    I just did the Worst Case WCA Test.  I am currently in LCWRA ESA Support Group due to mobility issues but this test only gave me 12 points so I would be in neither group.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Aw · 7 months ago
    I'm not sure this is responsible B&W. I know we want to warn government of potential risks but I think it's potentially dangerous to encourage claimants to imagine worst case scenarios at this point. I will not take the test, it would be terrifying to fail it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      D · 7 months ago
      @Aw Usually I’m against scaremongering but the dwp have put the disabled through the ringer the past 10-20years and keep coming back to inflict more on a regular bases and that is most likely because the disabled and their supporters never protest loudly enough (or just believe things so cruel will be allowed). Apparently there are 16mil disabled ppl in the uk - more than enough to create some noise and possibly force a u turn (or at least get labour rethinking their own disability policy)

      So scaremongering can be productive if making someone scared evolves to them being angry and if enough people get caught up in that then that could eventually lead to large scale protests and outcry which is then more noticeable to the media and finally to politicians 

      So to conclude as distasteful scaremongering is , it may be a necessary evil at this point
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rosie · 7 months ago
      @Aw I agree that simple scaremongering is not a good approach BUT I also think that, given the DWP's record and the constant media vilification of benefit claimants, so-called "worst case scenarios" are likely to become a reality. 
      As a naive novice claimant in 2010, I genuinely thought that I would be treated fairly and found unfit for work for the foreseeable future. I had no idea that two groups existed for ESA (WRAG and SG) and it wasn't until my first appointments with the Jobcentre staff and Work Coach that I realised I was in the WRAG; both the people I saw couldn't believe I'd been assessed as "temporarily unfit" and it was they who appealed for me to be in the Support Group!
      A recent article in the press about OAPs and PIP had a questionnaire worded "Is it right that taxpayers should bear the burden of paying disability benefits to the elderly who don't work?" THAT is the sort of prejudice and division that the right-wing media is currently sowing, and I have come to believe that most worst case scenarios for disabled claimants will turn out to be the reality in a few years. 
      You don't have to take the test to realise that the current "suggestions" are morally indefensible and need to be shot down.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Mark · 7 months ago
    Is this just ESA or PIP as well?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Porridge · 7 months ago
    I was not sure how to answer the questions which pertained to “sensory impairment”. I am autistic and I do not not whether the law considers that hypersensitivity (to all sensory i put) or hyposensitivity to it, due specifically to autismm, is a “sensory impairment”? I scored LCW on the mock test above.

    I would have found it totally impossible to find any employer who is willing to part with money to employ me, I am one hundred percent certain that no matter what punitive measures any government takes, this will not chnage for me. My disabilities are life long in my case. I do do volunteering for the local hospital but nobody wants to actually pay me for my work. I expect this is true of many disabled people. They can force us to be patronised by “work coaches” and they can take away what ever they want from us and make us live in abject poverty, but the harsh reality is that most employers do not want to give long-term disabled people a job, not even a job from home. Personally I have no “people skills” at all and I cannot sit down for longer than 15 minutes because of severe inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis in my spine (and other parts of my body), so what would they expect me to do as a job from home?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      D · 7 months ago
      @Porridge Also mps more than anyone should understand the importance of having a handle on ‘social interaction’ skills (actually there aren’t many jobs that don’t require some sort of interaction skills that some people either don’t have or in forcing themself can cause a negative reaction - excuse my tastelessness but in many cases a social disability is more of a barrier to work then some physical disabilities!)

      (There’s a reason why there are currently no mps with autism or any other social/communication based or partly based disability)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      D · 7 months ago
      @Porridge This is about the treasury clawing back money in order to fund red meat policies in a future budget.

      If they were really interested in getting the disabled in long term suitable work then the training of staff and the conversations with business to try and change attitudes would realistically take a few years

      The opposite of this seems to be happening 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      asmith25 · 7 months ago
      @Porridge I get LCWRA (and enhanced daily living and standard mobility PIP) and I am autistic (but no physical conditions) so it's definitely possible. PIP was much harder to get than LCWRA but both are horrible systems. I just checked what made me qualify and they assessed me under question 13, 'initiating and completing personal action' which is executive function issues. But depending on how autism affects you, questions 11, 14, 16 and 17 could also be appropriate in different circumstances before getting to any physical disabilities that you mentioned. Like if you have sensory issues and they are made worse by a sudden change (big or small) that wasn't expected, it can be very debilitating and if the system was actually designed to help us, it would realistically look at how our conditions affect us, rather than trying to put us in a box and push us all away. The government has literally made us sicker and less able to do things with its policies.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.