The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was published yesterday and is expected to be voted on for the first time in the Commons  at the beginning of July.  Below are the main provisions of the bill.

Personal Independence Payment

4-point rule

The Bill introduces the 4-point rule from a date yet to be announced, but intended to be November 2026.

From that date, new claimants will need to score:

  • at least 8 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the standard rate of the daily living component;
  • at least 12 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the enhanced rate of the daily living component.

Existing claimants will keep their current award until it is reviewed from November 2026, at which point they will be subject to the 4-point rule. 

So, if you have a review before November 2026, you will be subject to the existing rules, not the 4-point rule. 

There has been no indication from the DWP that they will bring forward anyone’s review dates.  So, if your next review is not due for say, another four years, then that is when you will be subject to the 4-point rule.

Pension-age PIP

There is a clause in the bill which allows the DWP to make “different provision for persons of different ages” which may be used to exempt claimants who have reached pension age by November 2026.  But there has been no official announcement about this and, at the moment, there are no different regulations for people of pension age.

Universal credit

Changes are being made to the rates of universal credit (UC) and, in addition, a severe conditions criteria category is being introduced.  (Similar rules are being put in place for ESA claimants who have not been migrated to UC by April 2026)

UC standard rates

The standard rates of UC will increase each year by more than the rate of inflation.  Using the 2026/27 rate as the baseline, the rate will increase by the rate of inflation plus 2.3% above inflation in 2026/27 up to 4.8% above inflation in 2029/30.  

UC LCWRA rates

The LCWRA element rate will be frozen from 2026/27 to 2029/30.

The LCWRA element rates for the 2026/27 tax year will be:

  • pre-2026 claimant  £423.27
  • severe conditions criteria claimant  £423.27
  • claimant who is terminally ill  £423.27
  • any other claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity £217.26

This means that the LCWRA rate for new claimants from April 2026 will be almost halved.

The DWP has begun WCA reviews again. So existing LCWRA claimants may have their award reviewed before April 2026.  But if you do not have a review before that date, or you maintain your LCWRA status when you are reviewed, then you will receive the pre-2026 claimant rate from April 2026.

Severe conditions criteria

From April 2026, a new category of LCWRA is being introduced.  In order to be in the severe conditions criteria (SCC) group, a clamant has firstly to meet one of the LCWRA criteria.  You can find a list of the criteria here.

In addition, all of the following criteria need to be met:

The level of function constantly applies to the claimant.  So, conditions that vary in severity may not meet this requirement.

The claimant will have the condition for the rest of their life.   So, conditions which might be cured by transplant/ surgery/treatments or conditions which might resolve may not meet this requirement.

It must have been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified health care professional in the course of the provision of NHS services.  So, it would appear that a diagnosis via a private doctor or consultant would not be acceptable.

If a claimant meets all these criteria they will be classed as having a severe, lifelong health condition and will not be subject to routine reassessment.

What isn’t in the bill

The bill only covers the PIP 4-point rule and changes to the rates of UC, plus the severe conditions criteria, which were added at the last minute as a concession to Labour rebels. 

It doesn’t, for example, deal with the abolition of the work capability assessment, the proposed new Unemployment Insurance or the plan to change the PIP assessment criteria.  These and other Green Paper proposals will be the subject of legislation at a later date.

Downloads

You can download the bill from the Get file link on this page.

Or you can download the file directly from this link

You can download the explanatory notes from this page

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Not even the whip thinks it's a good policy! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpd1qgpw08do
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Sorry that link below should have cut straight to the story about the labour whip quitting.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Hopefully the beginning of an avalanche. Stay strong guys, much love and solidarity xx

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/19/labour-mp-resigns-as-government-whip-in-protest-at-benefit-cuts
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    We have our first resignation.  Government whip Vicky Foxtrot resigns over welfare cuts.   Congrats to Vicky for making a stand.  The article also tells us that the bill will be debated on July 1st.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Vicky Foxcroft,a Labour whip has just tendered her resignation saying she cannot support these cuts to disability.This is very unusual and let's hope more follow.It is a truly shocking bill and once debated I feel the numbers against will be rising.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/ministers-are-secretly-considering-means-testing-pip-dwp-admits-despite-pledge-in-green-paper/

    B*****ds

    It’s official - labour minister like Kendall are making the likes of Robert Jenrick look like the pillar of honesty
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @D To be honest, although nobody wants this means-tested, they should have thought about means-testing before making the eligibility decision.  Depending on what level they went for, it would have been a much fairer way of making cuts, and those at the bottom would have been better protected.   However, I doubt they will dare make extra cuts to disability benefits.  They know they'll be lucky to see this one through.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Just on sky news a government whip has just resigned over welfare cuts looks very bad for the government to see this. This green paper definitely needs pausing to get us disabled and charties and government to work together to make the proposals fair and not pressure the genuine disabled get hurt. Thank you for reading my post 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I have added a thank you comment to Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft on FB for standing up for us and doing the right thing despite personal repercussions. If anyone else could do the same, I think she deserves a tidal wave of thanks. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Here we go - 1st MP resignation.


    MP resigns as government whip over benefit cuts
    Labour MP Vicky Foxcroft has resigned from her post as a government whip over Sir Keir Starmer's plan to cut benefits.

    She wrote in a letter to the prime minister that she could not vote "for reforms which include cuts to disabled people's finances".
    The former shadow minister for disabled people becomes the first MP to quit the government over the controversial welfare reform plans.

    The MP for Lewisham North wrote that the benefits system is in "desperate need of reform", adding: "I absolutely understand the need to address the ever-increasing welfare bill in these difficult economic times, but I have always believed this could and should be done by supporting more disabled people into work.

    "I do not believe that cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and the health element of Universal Credit should be part of the solution."

    Foxcroft said she has "wrestled" with the decision over whether to resign, but said: "Sadly it is now seems that we are not going to get the changes I desperately wanted to see.

    "I therefore tender my resignation as I know I will not be able to do the job that is required of me and whip – or indeed vote – for reforms which include cuts to disabled people's finances."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Another interesting article that has been  update since yesterday:

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Is there anything about what will happen with contributon Esa? 

    I really hope all this nonsense is knocked out of the park at the first vote...... I really don't get how removing a vital lifeline and thus people's dignity will somehow remove people's disabilities and/ or barriers to work whilst also creating 1000s of jobs for us all to go to......  🤦‍♀️

    Thanks. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Apologies for my duplicate question from yesterday, but I was hoping the proposals might shed some light on the question of people who qualify only for the mobility element after November 26. My husband is in the UC LCW group and works 10 hours per week. He’s 57 and just about manages 10 hours. No way can he manage 35! He currently qualifies for standard rate pip on both cars and mobility elements, but would only qualify for the mobility element under the new system. He has autism and some physical limitations 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Lucy72 Hi Lucy. Like my husband who’s on the same rates, if your husband doesn’t get 4 points in one category for daily living and at least 8 points total, he will only qualify for PIP mobility. In my case my husband will also lose LCWRA and I’ll lose Carers Allowance. Pretty evil in my book, seeing as my husband will still be unable to work and I’ll still need to care for him on top of my part time job. And I’m hoping they then don’t swipe the mobility element next. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @D It’s like being a criminal
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    What’s happening if someone qualifies for the mobility element of pip but not personal care? This hasn’t been mentioned at all in any of these changes which seems strange. Also how many hours per week minimum are people with disabilities, no longer eligible for pip, expected to work? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    UNISON member anybody or know one on PIP?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    The Independent is asking to hear from people with negative experiences in PIP assessments:

    Have you had a negative experience at a PIP assessment? Get in touch: albert.toth@independent.co.uk
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 hours ago
    all this Still no mention of this non means contribution based e s a support group for a person who was transfered over from incapacity benefit this is old style esa support group contribution based i was transfered over in 2017 after being on incaoacity benenfit since 1999 i was also dla indefinate award i was given an award in 2017 till 2024  they wrote in jan 2023 and i was awarded again in oct 2023 till 2029 i wont ho into detail because there isnt enough space but does anybody have the answer to this question please be kind but they all need to be gone so many lives wrecked id ask them come visit my home live my life see what my wife has done since 1999 as well as held a job and never claimed carers allowance let them have a go
    looking for answer limited capabilty for work esa support group contribution non means tested 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @not known I have also been concerned about this new style esa support group ( contributions based) but l have read that providing the criteria for lcwra are met ( presumably 4 in a daily living component PIP)
      ESA payments WILL continue for those awarded prior to ( l think) Nov 2026. This is reassuring however it will not apply to new claimants
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    Independent MPs table amendment to scrap welfare bill


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Yorkie Bard I would love that to succeed so as to tell Keir Starmer to shove it where the sun don't shine.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.