PIP impact assessment

A PIP impact assessment has now been published.


UC rates

The Bill provides for above inflation increases in the standard rate of UC, from 2.3% above inflation in 2026/27 to 4.8% above inflation in 2029/30.

However, the LCWRA rate will be frozen from 2026/27 to 2029/30.

The LCWRA element rates for the 2026/27 tax year will be:

  • pre-2026 claimant  £423.27
  • severe conditions criteria claimant  £423.27
  • claimant who is terminally ill  £423.27
  • any other claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity £217.26
Severe conditions criteria - no private doctor diagnoses allowed.

The Bill provides that claimants who meet the severe conditions criteria for UC will never have to have another reassessment and will be paid the higher rate of UC health element of £97 per week.

The criteria are essentially the descriptors for being found to have LCWRA for UC - we cover this in more detail in "How the severe conditions criteria work" on this page - with four further requirement:

  • The individual’s level of function will always meet LCWRA
  • The individual’s condition will last for the rest of their life
  • There is no realistic prospect of recovery of function, and
  • The condition has been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified healthcare professional in the course of the provision of NHS services.

That last bullet appears to mean that an adult living in an area where they will have to wait literally years for an NHS assessment of say ADHD or autism will not be able to pay for a private assessment and have that accepted for the purpose of getting the higher rate of UC health element.


"one of the most generous ever"

The DWP press release boasts that:

"The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will provide 13-weeks of additional financial security to existing claimants affected by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who their lose eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer’s element of Universal Credit.

"The 13-week additional protection will give people who will be affected by the changes time to adapt, access new, tailored employment support, and plan for their future once they are reassessed and their entitlement ends.

"This transitional cover is one of the most generous ever and more than three times the length of protection provided for the transition from DLA to PIP."


Press release from the DWP

The DWP have issued  a press release headed "Welfare bill will protect the most vulnerable and help households with income boost".  It quotes Liz Kendall as saying:

"This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.

"This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change."


PIP changes in the Bill

The 4-point rule and the 13 week run-on if you lose your PIP because of it are confirmed.  Plus a clause which could be used to allow for pension age PIP claimants to be exempt from the 4-point rule

Clause 5 deals with PIP.  

Subsection 1 confirms the requirement to:

score at least 8 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the standard rate;

score at least 12 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the enhanced rate.

In other words, the 4-point rule.

Paragraph 6 (c) confirms that PIP will be payable for 13 weeks after a decision that you are no longer entitled to PIP daily living component as a result of failing the 4-point rule.

Subsection 2 says that the secretary of state (SoS) will decide the date on which the new rules begin.  The explanatory notes add that this is intended to be November 2026.  The change will not apply to any given claimant until their award is reassessed.  So for claimants with longer awards it may be some years distant - by which time there may be an entirely new PIP test.

Subsection 4 appears to be a "get-out clause" to allow the SoS to make special provisions for particular groups of people.  They almost certainly have pension age PIP claimants in mind here.  The paragraph actually says:

"to make different provision for different cases or purposes (including different provision for persons of different ages);"

So, for example, it might allow the SoS to decide that the 4-point rule will never apply to any person at or over pension age, who is already in receipt of PIP daily living in November 2026.   This would give pension age claimants an exemption, but it's interesting that this is not being put into the Act itself.

The subsection also allows the secretary of state to provide for "a person to exercise discretion in dealing with any matter".  

 

Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill published

The bill has now been published.  You can download the 22 page .pdf document from the Get file link on this page.

Or you can download the file directly from this link

You can download the explanatory notes from this page

There's also an impact assessment on the Universal Credit Rebalancing from the Department for Work and Pensions - May 2025


Money Bill

There has been discussion about whether Labour will seek to have this bill designated as a money bill, which would effectively remove House of Lords scrutiny.  A decision about whether a bill is a money bill is made by the Speaker of the House, after the report stage.  However, according to guidance on Money Bills from the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel: 

1.35 During the debates in 1911 it was alleged to be a defect in the bill that the Speaker was not required to make his decision earlier because of the risk of the Commons proceedings being completed in ignorance of whether the bill was to be certified. There is now an informal indication, published as a note when the Bill is listed on the Commons Order Paper, as to whether a bill is likely to be certified as a money bill.

The notice that the bill will be presented today on the Order Paper makes no mention of a money bill, so this seems to be an indication - though not a certainty - that Labour are not pursuing this possibility.


Bill due this afternoon

The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to be published this afternoon.  This is the bill that will enable the introduction of the PIP 4-point rule and cuts to universal credit for disabled claimants.

We’ll provides links, analysis and the opportunity for you to comment on this page.

According to the UK parliament website, it is a:  "Bill to make provision to alter the rates of the standard allowance, limited capability for work element and limited capability for work and work-related activity element of universal credit and the rates of income-related employment and support allowance, and to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment."

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 51 minutes ago
    One of the most generous ever … I can hardly contain my excitement. Can I ask a question please.  Do you get your PIP review from the date your award started I.e the date you applied or the date you receive confirmation of your successful award. So my application for PIP was  requested 6 March 2024 and I got my letter confirming I had a successful award in June 2024. My award was backdated obviously so would I get a form in September 25 to be reassessed?. My award looks like it was only 2 years. Thank you for any help 🤩
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 58 minutes ago
    I thought I'd missed something, but there's no mention of the Work Capability Assessment change in this bill - so presumably the fight to not let Daily Living PIP be the sole route to getting LCWRA/Health will be ongoing even if this bill makes it through (and I assume it will).  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Still doesn’t say what happens after 2028 for current lcwra claimants before 2026 when wca is gone does that carry on or does it stop and get told to apply for pip?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 49 minutes ago
      @Bluebird I think I will ask my MP this so if I get an answer I will put on here. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    soooo, you wont get anything from nhs cause its broken and starmer and co know this, and you cant go private.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Outside the Sun 🌞 is shining, but I'm spiralling into a darkness I've never been in,even with the PIP I'm struggling to pay the  Bedroom Tax and for the ever rising costs of utilities and food,I'm already in debt,and with this it's almost inevitable I'll lose the house,or should I say home I've lived in since I was 5yo.
    This is not been melodramatic,its just a reality that's snuffed out all hope.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    I will be 77 next week. I am on low level mobility and high level care parts of PIP. My mobility got a lot worse after I retired, and continues to do so.  I must admit to not understanding most of the changes that are happening. I am concerned because I just get by now. If I loose my PIP I don’t know how I will cope.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    Well iv got say they made it life is not worth living no more what the point in sumbody living if they scored 12 points the higher rate but there not going get no help because they not got 4 points in one
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    The Kendall Welfare Reform – A Deep Cut Hidden in Velvet
    As we know, at the heart of it is Liz Kendall’s new bill are proposals for fundamental change to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC). This policy is being sold to the public as fair, sustainable and supportive. Scratch the surface and what you find is austerity in softer clothes. It’s a quiet retreat from compassion presented as progress.

    I’ve now fully transcribed Kendall’s interview with Tom Swarbrick this afternoon on LBC and I urge anyone who cares about disabled people, or fairness more generally, to pay close attention to what she said — and perhaps more importantly, what she didn’t say.

    “Robust Protections” – A Euphemism for Time-Limited Pain
    Kendall says anyone who loses their PIP under the new system will be protected for three months. That sounds reassuring until you realise what it means. It means you keep your benefit for thirteen weeks after reassessment before it’s stopped. After that, the benefit is gone. There is no automatic appeal or extended safeguard.

    Three months is nothing in the context of disability. If your PIP is used to pay for your transport, your care, your ability to remain in work or even in your home, losing it will hit like a landslide. This so-called protection is just a grace period before people fall off the edge. It is not a safeguard. It is a countdown.

    “Never Reassessed Again” – But Who Decides That?
    Kendall claims that people with the most severe conditions will never be reassessed again. This sounds compassionate until you ask who gets to decide what counts as “severe”.

    These decisions are not made by GPs or consultants who know the person. They are made by private contractors working for companies like Capita, Atos and Maximus on behalf of the DWP. The person doing the assessment may be a paramedic or a physiotherapist or a nurse. They may have no clinical experience with the condition being assessed. They are called “health professionals” yet many are working from scripts and software, not medical judgement.

    A person with Parkinson’s could be assessed by a physiotherapist with no neurological background. A person with schizophrenia might be evaluated over the phone by a nurse. These contractors are not independent. They are paid to apply thresholds designed to restrict access. That’s the reality behind Kendall’s promise of permanent awards. A permanent award is only as meaningful as the integrity of the system used to decide it.

    The Hidden Trap: The Four-Point Rule
    One of the most alarming proposals in the new system is the “four-point rule”. Kendall made no mention of this in the interview. That omission is telling.

    Currently, PIP is awarded based on how your condition affects your ability to do everyday activities. You score points across multiple areas. If the total reaches eight, you receive the standard rate. Twelve or more gets you the enhanced rate. You can score small amounts in many areas and still qualify. This reflects how real life works — especially for people with complex or fluctuating conditions.

    The new rule would require you to score at least four points in a single activity. If you scored three points in four different areas — showing consistent but moderate difficulty — you would receive nothing. This is a technical change designed purely to reduce the number of successful claims.
    People with mental illness, neurodivergence, chronic fatigue or a range of milder but cumulative impairments will be hardest hit. Their support will vanish because they don’t tick one big enough box.

    “The Number of PIP Claims Has Doubled – It’s Unsustainable”
    Kendall keeps repeating that PIP claims have risen from 2 million to over 4.3 million. She uses this to argue that the system is no longer sustainable. But this rise is not suspicious. It is understandable.

    PIP replaced DLA which had narrower criteria. Awareness of conditions like autism, ADHD, long COVID, fibromyalgia and mental illness has grown. Many people who were once overlooked are now being recognised. This is not a failure of the system. It is a reflection of increased need and greater understanding.

    Claiming that this rise is “unsustainable” is not only inaccurate. It is dangerous. It implies fraud where none exists. It sets the public against the vulnerable. It repeats the myth that there is something shameful about asking for help.

    “Nine in Ten Will Still Be on PIP” – A Misleading Statistic
    Kendall claims that nine out of ten people currently on PIP will still be receiving it at the end of the Parliament. That sounds comforting. But it doesn’t tell the full story.

    That figure comes from the government’s impact assessment. It is an average. It does not reflect who will lose out. It ignores the disproportionate harm to people with mental health conditions, learning disabilities or variable symptoms. It does not include new claimants who will face much tougher tests. And it does not count those who will be discouraged from reapplying.

    If you are the one who loses your benefit, it won’t matter that nine others didn’t. The statistic means nothing to those whose lives it flattens.

    “We’re Saving £3.5 Billion” – From Whom?
    Kendall proudly states that the Office for Budget Responsibility projects £3.5 billion in savings from these changes. That figure makes clear what this really is. This is not about better outcomes or helping people into work. It is about cuts.

    That money is coming from people who currently receive PIP. There is no other way to generate a saving of that scale. You cannot reduce spending and increase compassion at the same time. One of those claims is a lie.

    “Biggest Ever Investment in Employment Support” – But at What Cost?
    Kendall says Labour is putting £1 billion into employment support. She says it’s the biggest investment ever. On the surface that sounds hopeful.

    But we’ve heard this before. Under the Work Programme, similar promises were made. What followed was a regime of sanctions, meaningless training, targets and humiliation. There is nothing in Kendall’s bill to guarantee this will be different.

    Unless that support is voluntary, specialist-led, disability-aware and free from punishment, it will not lift people up. It will grind them down.

    “Universal Credit Will Rise” – But That Doesn’t Fill the Gap
    Kendall points to a permanent above-inflation rise in Universal Credit. The IFS says it’s the biggest since 1980. But that rise is not a replacement for PIP.

    PIP is not means-tested. It is paid in addition to other benefits or wages. It covers the additional costs of living with a disability — transport, care, special diets, adapted homes, energy bills. Losing it can mean losing independence itself.

    Raising UC slightly while removing PIP is like offering someone a thicker blanket after taking their roof away.

    The Case of Georgina – A Human Face Dismissed
    Tom Swarbrick asked Kendall about a woman named Georgina who has Huntington’s disease. She is terrified of losing her support. Kendall said she didn’t know Georgina’s scores and would “take it away”.

    That response says it all.

    Huntington’s is a degenerative, terminal condition. It robs people of speech, movement, memory and eventually life itself. If someone like Georgina cannot be guaranteed protection, then the system is not fit for purpose. Kendall’s failure to reassure speaks louder than anything else she said today as well as at any other time.

    “Perverse Incentives” – The Return of the Old Lie
    Kendall says the current system incentivises people to define themselves as incapable of work. This is a revival of the worst kind of stigma.

    Most people on PIP are not choosing idleness. Many work or want to work. PIP helps them stay well enough to do so. It pays for taxis, therapy, pain relief, childcare and care workers. It allows people to function.

    To claim it encourages dependency is not only untrue. It is dangerous. It is the same narrative that justified the cruelty of the past decade. And it must be challenged every time it appears.

    On The Language, The Deception and Moral Injury
    Some may ask whether it's fair to describe Liz Kendall as a con artist or a political ghoul. I understand the weight of those words. I also understand the cost of polite silence.

    What else should we call someone who disguises a vast programme of cuts in the language of dignity and fairness? Who conceals the most destructive parts of her reform — such as the four-point rule — while insisting that nine in ten people will be “just fine”? Who dodges plain answers about terminal illness and reassures us with empty phrases like “we’re going further” or “you’ll be protected”?

    This is not a mistake. It is a deliberate strategy to soften resistance while making support harder to access and easier to remove. And it is being done to people who are already ill, already exhausted and often unable to fight back.

    If that is not political ghoulishness then what is it?

    Even without using those labels in public, the behaviour speaks for itself. Kendall is not telling the truth. She is not safeguarding the vulnerable. She is managing the optics of a slow dismantling of the welfare state. And she is doing so with the confidence of someone who believes most won’t notice and fewer will resist.

    I notice. Many of us do. We are not going to let it pass without record.

    My Closing Thoughts
    Liz Kendall’s reforms are not about fairness or sustainability. They are about limiting access. They are about cutting spending. They are about shifting the burden of disability away from the state and onto the individual.

    If this bill passes as a money bill, it will escape full scrutiny in the House of Lords. That makes public challenge even more urgent. It makes truth-telling essential.

    I’ll be writing to my MP tomorrow. I’ve had enough for today. I’ll be raising this wherever I can. If you care about disabled people, now is the time to speak.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Disy Disy, this is brilliant. Where’s it going apart from your MP? Do you have an online blog? Are you sharing it on social media? MPs need to see it and be educated!! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Disy Disy. Great analysis of the situation. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Wayne Wayne once labour gets the cuts to Pip Daily Living Allowance passed through parliament, next year they will return and reduce eligibility for Pip mobility too. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
     While the main fear for most will be suffering poverty due to losing their disability benefits. Even those not under financial threat are under threat of harm due to the mantra of helping everyone towards and into work. The government needs to stop thinking all disabled people should be expected and encouraged into work and start accepting that for many the message should be take things easy and enjoy your life best as you can, your health and happiness is what matters. The consequences of not doing this are needless hospitalizations and deaths of people pushed towards and into work when that is not just not appropriate but downright reckless and dangerous.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Starmer thinks he has won enough voters back with his u turn on winter fuel payments which he only did through utter panic at Labours local elections awful results.
    Voting or rather losing votes terrifies these truly vile people.
    He thinks that he can now play to the right wing media. So it's all back to grinding the disabled into utter poverty. What he and his cronies plan is simply evil and wicked. Utter cynism.
    Basically they intend eventually putting us all through a much tougher pip assessment then using only that result for pip,Esa and the health component of Univerasal credit.
    Like vultures the Tories gloat and can't believe his utter naivety giving them a warrant to be even worse when they return to power in 4 years.
    Both these parties have the knives out for us and don't think Reform will rescue us.
    All we can do is vote against Labour whenever possible and if you have a Labour Mp write or email them stating that you will never vote for them when they next come grovelling and lying to keep their £93950 job.
    If the anxiety and fear we are all under affects your health see your GP get it on your record.
    Any worsening or new problems get it on your medical record we will need every bit of evidence for the inevitable tribunals.
    Personally I cannot see these people changing direction out of pity or Empathy they only care for their sickening careers.
    Only pushing back may help please try.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Arthur I think I will have to. Will speak to my Consultant Ophthalmologist at my next appointment. S letter from a specialist will trump anything from a GP
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    From what I’ve seen the Labour so called rebels are now caving in to their dictator Starmer, so realistically it’s as good as done, just a formality. Shows that all politicians and political parties are made up of self serving sociopaths. 

    Welcome to the dystopian future for disabled, mentally ill and chronically ill people in this country, three choices, extreme poverty, homelessness or the one that most appealing to me and lots of people I’ve spoken to is suicide, as what is the point living when it’s a forgone conclusion and life a head is this bleak. To be honest it’ll be a release for the constant worry and mental anguish this labour government has caused and will cause for the future. Face facts we are not even second class citizens we are the lowest of the low to them. Face it they have won we the disabled minority have failed. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 39 minutes ago
      @Kevin Hang on, I thought that the Tories and lib dems were against the cuts and were going to vote against? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Kevin Kevin I used to be a social worker - would you care to tell me roughly where you live? I might be able to arrange some further help for you, Yorkie
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Kevin Where have you seen this? I have not seen this anywhere.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Kevin
      "From what I’ve seen the Labour so called rebels are now caving in to their dictator Starmer, so realistically it’s as good as done, just a formality"

      Don't pay too much attention to propaganda being put out by the whips. This article suggests that Kendall's "concessions" have not gone down particularly well:


      "The mixture of concessions and threats did not appear to have won over wavering Labour MPs, however, and many went public with their criticism after the bill was published."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Kevin We don't know that for sure, to be honest.  Don't always believe what Labour are telling us, because they want us to believe the numbers are low so the rebels feel isolated.   They might be telling the truth - but we simply don't know.  What matters right now, I think, is whether this goes through as a money bill or not.  That could be absolutely vital.  If it doesn't, there will be scrutiny from the Lords, who will probably add amendments, and the bill could go back and forth for some times.  That gives us longer to get the message across, and for more impact assessments to come out.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    If private diagnosis is worthless, does that mean people working as private practitioners will end up losing their businesses and the NHS waiting lists will grow even longer?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Anon Aren't the NHS waiting lists coming down,as Reeves gave them a big cash injection.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Anon I think the BMA/GMC and the Royal Colleges will kick a stink on this...and they really do have power
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    I'm just about to give up, how can a lot of the government even understand what anyone is going through. No private diagnosis (but I bet many of them are in private). I can still remember years ago a gov person was asked how much was a pint of milk..... didn't have a clue. 

    I put my pip form in over a year ago, when I rang up via Relay Uk I was waiting in a queue that long I had 4 different people on my side of the call as they were due a break. 

    Finally got to where I need, asked if any news on my form. And the person on the other end said "oh no dear the earliest it will be looked at is 52 weeks"  My poor call handler said in total shock "that's a year!!". Then keep saying sorry because they never react to is being said as they are not meant to. I didn't mind it was nice to see someone other than us see it as balmy.

    April they extended my pip for a year as they have not looked at it yet. With all the changes I think I will lose it anyway. And I am terrified about what will happen not just to me but everyone else as well. No one wants the disabled, mental health issues, and the many other people who have problems and the elderly. Get a job, I can't even leave the house on my own.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Is a legal challenge possible at this stage - or at all? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    My understanding is, people who claim LCWRA (pre 2026 claimant) will see no change, other than the current rate remaining frozen until 2029 I think it said but will continue to see UC rates raise annually. Those with life long severe health conditions will never be reassessed again...also (pre 2026). Am I right or wrong...anyone?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Dean If they are reassessed
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    So more face to face  means more staff and wages and buildings to buy or rent ,more utility bills etc, back to work group training means the same, stopping pip will for sure at least double or treble tribunals,  more staff and overheads,  all in all it's going to cost more than the money they say they are going to save! Maybe we should all apply for jobs! I wonder what care home would take me on the staff again at the age of 58 and doped up on morphine all day? Unable to lift or bend to dress someone else because of neuropathy, that's just one of many chronic illnesses I have been unfortunately stuck with! But still as long as I can still breathe I should be able to work right?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    It seems that the top and bottom is to get 4 points, now most of us don't now so really what chance do we actually have,  its soul destroying. The thing that gets me is they don't consider how you actually feel,  I have chronic illnesses and 3 types of neuropathy that stops me going out unless I really have to. I have other things wrong to but the main thing is I feel ill! I feel rough! It's a constant thing,, if I was working now I would be constantly ringing in sick because I feel dreadful most days, not just with the pain I suffer 24/7 anyway,  but physically ill and non of them take that into account, how we feel.... , ironically I worked in health care for 35 years and this is the thanks you get,, at the age of 58 do they expect me to go back and do it again?  It's a joke! They could save 12 billion by not sending the money we paid in all. Those years abroad like it's nothing!  How many people do you think will lose it on the 4 point score?  And they are well aware of this to, a given,  a cruel catch to the whole thing.. what can we do?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @gingin Kendall doesn't seem to understand that if you're cutting people's benefits by £9000 a year, it doesn't matter whether the benefits system collapses or not because it's not doing its job.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact