PIP impact assessment

A PIP impact assessment has now been published.


UC rates

The Bill provides for above inflation increases in the standard rate of UC, from 2.3% above inflation in 2026/27 to 4.8% above inflation in 2029/30.

However, the LCWRA rate will be frozen from 2026/27 to 2029/30.

The LCWRA element rates for the 2026/27 tax year will be:

  • pre-2026 claimant  £423.27
  • severe conditions criteria claimant  £423.27
  • claimant who is terminally ill  £423.27
  • any other claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity £217.26
Severe conditions criteria - no private doctor diagnoses allowed.

The Bill provides that claimants who meet the severe conditions criteria for UC will never have to have another reassessment and will be paid the higher rate of UC health element of £97 per week.

The criteria are essentially the descriptors for being found to have LCWRA for UC - we cover this in more detail in "How the severe conditions criteria work" on this page - with four further requirement:

  • The individual’s level of function will always meet LCWRA
  • The individual’s condition will last for the rest of their life
  • There is no realistic prospect of recovery of function, and
  • The condition has been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified healthcare professional in the course of the provision of NHS services.

That last bullet appears to mean that an adult living in an area where they will have to wait literally years for an NHS assessment of say ADHD or autism will not be able to pay for a private assessment and have that accepted for the purpose of getting the higher rate of UC health element.


"one of the most generous ever"

The DWP press release boasts that:

"The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will provide 13-weeks of additional financial security to existing claimants affected by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who their lose eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer’s element of Universal Credit.

"The 13-week additional protection will give people who will be affected by the changes time to adapt, access new, tailored employment support, and plan for their future once they are reassessed and their entitlement ends.

"This transitional cover is one of the most generous ever and more than three times the length of protection provided for the transition from DLA to PIP."


Press release from the DWP

The DWP have issued  a press release headed "Welfare bill will protect the most vulnerable and help households with income boost".  It quotes Liz Kendall as saying:

"This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.

"This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change."


PIP changes in the Bill

The 4-point rule and the 13 week run-on if you lose your PIP because of it are confirmed.  Plus a clause which could be used to allow for pension age PIP claimants to be exempt from the 4-point rule

Clause 5 deals with PIP.  

Subsection 1 confirms the requirement to:

score at least 8 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the standard rate;

score at least 12 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the enhanced rate.

In other words, the 4-point rule.

Paragraph 6 (c) confirms that PIP will be payable for 13 weeks after a decision that you are no longer entitled to PIP daily living component as a result of failing the 4-point rule.

Subsection 2 says that the secretary of state (SoS) will decide the date on which the new rules begin.  The explanatory notes add that this is intended to be November 2026.  The change will not apply to any given claimant until their award is reassessed.  So for claimants with longer awards it may be some years distant - by which time there may be an entirely new PIP test.

Subsection 4 appears to be a "get-out clause" to allow the SoS to make special provisions for particular groups of people.  They almost certainly have pension age PIP claimants in mind here.  The paragraph actually says:

"to make different provision for different cases or purposes (including different provision for persons of different ages);"

So, for example, it might allow the SoS to decide that the 4-point rule will never apply to any person at or over pension age, who is already in receipt of PIP daily living in November 2026.   This would give pension age claimants an exemption, but it's interesting that this is not being put into the Act itself.

The subsection also allows the secretary of state to provide for "a person to exercise discretion in dealing with any matter".  

 

Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill published

The bill has now been published.  You can download the 22 page .pdf document from the Get file link on this page.

Or you can download the file directly from this link

You can download the explanatory notes from this page

There's also an impact assessment on the Universal Credit Rebalancing from the Department for Work and Pensions - May 2025


Money Bill

There has been discussion about whether Labour will seek to have this bill designated as a money bill, which would effectively remove House of Lords scrutiny.  A decision about whether a bill is a money bill is made by the Speaker of the House, after the report stage.  However, according to guidance on Money Bills from the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel: 

1.35 During the debates in 1911 it was alleged to be a defect in the bill that the Speaker was not required to make his decision earlier because of the risk of the Commons proceedings being completed in ignorance of whether the bill was to be certified. There is now an informal indication, published as a note when the Bill is listed on the Commons Order Paper, as to whether a bill is likely to be certified as a money bill.

The notice that the bill will be presented today on the Order Paper makes no mention of a money bill, so this seems to be an indication - though not a certainty - that Labour are not pursuing this possibility.


Bill due this afternoon

The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to be published this afternoon.  This is the bill that will enable the introduction of the PIP 4-point rule and cuts to universal credit for disabled claimants.

We’ll provides links, analysis and the opportunity for you to comment on this page.

According to the UK parliament website, it is a:  "Bill to make provision to alter the rates of the standard allowance, limited capability for work element and limited capability for work and work-related activity element of universal credit and the rates of income-related employment and support allowance, and to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment."

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    So a private psychiatrist who also works for the NHS.  DWP will accept diagnosis if provided under their NHS contract, but not if provided privately🤔. There is a shortage of NHS professionals and you have to wait years for an assessment and supoort!  It makes no sense🤦‍♂️!  We have health insurance and after several unliving incidents we had no choice but to go private.  We see an independent Psych who also works for NHS and their professional diagnosis differed greatly to NHS psych and is actually an accurate diagnosis and report.  NHS refuse to acknowledge new diagnosis, but if we saw the same psych under NHS it would be accepted.   This is just madness!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 56 minutes ago
      @AN @AN. This is a ploy to stop people from being eligible for PIP......they won't accept self diagnosis or private diagnosis as medical evidence which just leaves NHS diagnosis but average NHS waiting lists for both mental and physical treatments/diagnosis is 1-2 years!!! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 hours ago
    Any comments on changes to contributions-based ESA?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    From what l can see the number of MPs (Labour) who will vote against the bill is around 50. So l think it will go through. Does anyone know what will happen to the New Style ESA ( contribution based)when it is replaced by a new time - bound benefit?
    Currently that provides nearly £600 pcm for those of us who actually spent around 40 years working before claiming any thing? So we are going to be abandoned are we? If we can’t claim UC?
    So unjust and ill thought out if that is the case. 62 and 40 years contributions. Worked and still do a few hours with Systemic Lupus plus other things. Can anyone else relate to this or know what will happen?
    My saving grace is I atleast scored one 4 at my recent review and award is for 7 years and l Will of course be in receipt of state pension then.
    I feel sorry for anyone who hasn’t. It’s just awful 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Cmjdexter
      "From what l can see the number of MPs (Labour) who will vote against the bill is around 50"

      We'll have to see how the vote goes, but there is a lot of propaganda being out by the whips. If the government loses the vote it's likely to be due to a mixture of votes against and abstentions, quite possibly with more of the latter than the former.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    One of the things I find odd about this. 
    Someone with a PIP daily living award and UC health/LCWRA award could have a WCA reassessment in 2026 or 2027 and lose their UC health/LCWRA, then in 2028 automatically get UC health/LCWRA based on their PIP award. And be treated as a new half the money UC health award despite the award being made based on a PIP assessment that predates April 2026 and the new UC health element eligibility being in theory a higher bar (fewer people eligible). If WCA reassessments continue up to the day the WCA is abolished in theory someone could lose UC health/LCWRA for a day and get it back at half the money. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 47 minutes ago
      @John @John. Probably an unlikely scenario because the scoring criteria and eligibility for the new PIP assessment is much stricter than the current WCA and PIP assessments. i.e. If a claimant fails the current WCA and or PIP assessment, they would almost certainly fail next year's tougher assessment too.    
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    For a long time it's been bothering me - who does Liz Kendall remind me of - with her "hung-dog" expression?

    The youngsters on here might well need to Google "Huckleberry Hound".
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    My ASD diagnosis was done by the NHS but my ADHD diagnosis was from psychiatry UK via NHS right to choose so technically that is still NHS involvement. I wonder if there will be an issue with that. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    I still don't know what qualifies as a severe condition. I'm sure 99% of us would classify ourselves as severely disabled. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Does anyone know when this bill will go to the vote? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Anon June 30th I heard.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/25249573.welfare-shake-up-set-spark-backbench-rebellion/?ref=twtrec

    Dr Zubir Ahmed, the MP for Glasgow South West, said he was "supportive of welfare reform because what we’re not proposing is welfare cuts; what we are proposing is the slope of increase that we spend on welfare being not as high as it would be by 2029–30."

    Jesus Christ some of these MPs have coconut brains

    Did they even read the introduction paragraph of the bill and its goals?!

    “..,….to reduce eligibility of personal independence payment”

    How stupid do these MPs think the uk public are (sadly the uk educational department has been under funded for years so many probably don’t have the intelligence they should - explains why reform are even a thing)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    I'm sick of this labour party the government always pick on the elderly and the disabled I think WHY us it isn't our fault we are poorly .why don't the government MPs prime minister all of you take a huge pay cut that will put plenty back in the pot and remember you all have to get old let's see what happens to you when you cannot work this is one serious JOKE
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    I wonder how many mobility scheme cars will be sent back because of reforms people will need the mobility money for bills the mobility scheme will not last
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Wayne Hi Wayne, i maybe wrong but i think the new PIP 4points rule is only for living element and not the mobility element. I get motability scheme you have to have 12 points to get the enhanced rate and you can only get motability on the enhanced rate.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    ""This transitional cover is one of the most generous ever and more than three times the length of protection provided for the transition from DLA to PIP.""

    You've never had so many crumbs from the table!

    "The criteria are essentially the descriptors for being found to have LCWRA for UC - we cover this in more detail in "How the severe conditions criteria work" on this page - with four further requirement:

    The individual’s level of function will always meet LCWRA
    The individual’s condition will last for the rest of their life
    There is no realistic prospect of recovery of function, and
    The condition has been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified healthcare professional in the course of the provision of NHS services."

    Well, I have an illness that I've had my entire adult life and there is no realistic prospect of my condition improving, so I'll be asking my consultant for evidence to that effect at my next appointment. Hopefully this nonsense gets voted down and that evidence won't be needed, but it's best to be prepared.

    I noticed that the DWP apparently expects about 200,000 people to qualify for the severe condtions criteria. That appears to be another figure they've pulled from a random orifice, as there will almost certainly be a heck of a lot more people than that who are currently on LCWRA and have evidence from their GPs or consultants that their condtion is not expected to improve. It really does sound like what happened with the ESA support group all over again.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    I don't understand it ,seems like people are going to lose their UC disability element as well as PIP ,this is hell. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    The government has been involved in three major controversies of late. Farmers with £1m+, pip cuts and the winter fuel payments.
    The first effects a group with very large assets  and allows them to pay over 10 years.
    The second affects some potentially very poor people and could strip up to 70% of their entire income ( may be more than £10000 a year with the knock on losses). For most it is very unlikely they can make up their losses elsewhere.
    The third is about £300 a year, and however disappointing, unlikely to be key to their total wellbeing. 
    In terms of impact There is simply no comparison of severity for the impacted group, it’s not like they are taking a few quid off people. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    You would have thought that they would have split it into two types of pip. Those still working and those retired. That way when you retire you transition to the retirement type which as softer rules and longer awards. It’s still so complicated and there are so many variables and interpretations that it’s so bloody complicated that the only thing achieved is general confusion. You either have system of flexible rules with ranges on or written in stone rules with no flexibility. But you can’t have both. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I know this might sound unfair of me but don’t the MPs have a duty of care to read the evidence that has been published about the harms the cuts will cause. Surely they should be aware if they are voting for such measures. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Well I'm done for then......I have multiple auto immune diseases , and some of those were diagnosed p

      I must say the consultants who diagnosed me also work for the NHS, i was literally at deaths door with pain, so now  some of my diagnoses's don't count for anything...even though I have bloods, scans, surgeries etc to prove it. Disgraceful.

    I really am of the opinion that they are trying to 'kill us off'.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @D Thanks D, so much of it is unclear. I wish they would be more 'upfront' instead of trying to 'pull the wool over our eyes'.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Rose I’m not sure if pre existing diagnosis is included in this (pre April 2026) - hopefully that can be clarified soon

      (Ps, pushed the down vote by mistake, not intended, sorry 😢 )
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    If getting a ‘four pointer’ is determined to be indicative of greater need, then maybe people who get  multiple ‘ four pointers’ should get an enhanced level ! Just a thought!
    ( in all seriousness I just don’t get why 2+2 is worth less than 4, and I think the whole basis of this change is ill thought out. If anything it shows a wider range of need.)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    The more I think about it ,the more I think this legislation is Malicious, designed to kill the sick and disabled and make housing stock available,from people they see as useless eaters. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact