There are strong indications that the government is set to announce the abolition of the work capability assessment (WCA) and the introduction of automated sanctions for UC claimants.

Members have been contacting Benefits and Work over the weekend after seeing media reports that the work capability assessment (WCA) is to be abolished.  The main source of the reports seems to be a briefing obtained by Torsten Bell of the Resolution Foundation thinktank.

According to the document:

“A Health and Disability White Paper will be published on the day of the budget outlining our plans to scrap the Work Capability Assessment.  Under the current system disabled people need to have a health assessment and be found incapable of work to receive additional income support through the benefits system.  Scrapping the Work Capability Assessment is the biggest reform to the welfare system in a decade, meaning that disabled people can try work without fear of losing their benefits, and reducing the number of assessments needed to qualify for health-related benefits.”

There will also be changes to the sanctions regime in universal credit (UC)

Changes to Universal Credit will include . . . Strengthening the application of the Universal Credit sanctions regime. This includes additional training for Jobcentre Work Coaches to ensure they are applying sanctions effectively, including for claimants who do not look for or take up employment, and automating administrative elements of the sanctions process, including sending automated messages to claimants who fail to meet their Work Coach and take active steps to move into work or increase their earnings.

Whilst abolishing the WCA  may sound like good news, it does very much depend on what - if anything - is put in its place.

For example, if there is no longer a WCA then how will it be decided whether a claimant will be eligible for additional payments because they are unlikely ever to be able to work?   Will this be somehow combined with PIP or will there simply be no additional payment for new claimants?

In addition, who will decide which claimants should be subject to sanctions if they don’t seek work, because they say their health conditions prevents them doing so?

The alleged changes to the sanctions regime are much less uncertain and clearly bad news.  UC sanctions are already at record levels, so ‘strengthening’ them can only bring greater misery.

Ensuring work coaches are ‘applying sanctions effectively’ is also likely to be bad news for claimants.  As the DWP have for years refused to publish the result of their own research into whether sanctions are effective in getting claimants back into work, it is not clear what ‘effectively’ can mean other than more harshly.

And the idea that sanctions notices are going to be sent out automatically by DWP software can only add to the nightmare that claimants trying to communicate with the DWP already experience

At the moment there is very little information available about these changes..

But there can be little doubt that change is coming.  Back in January we reported on rumours that the WCA was to be scrapped.

And as far back as September 2021 we revealed that the DWP would be issuing new contracts under which assessments for both PIP and the WCA would be carried out by the same company in any given area.

At the time the reason for the change was not clear.  But if the WCA is to be gradually phased out, and elements of it possibly combined with PIP,  then it obviously doesn’t make sense to have a separate company doing WCAs.

We should stress that it is much too soon to start worrying about these changes.

We won’t have more details until Wednesday and it will probably take years for any changes to the WCA to be consulted on and passed into law.

In addition, it is likely that the changes will apply only to new claimants and not to existing ones.

But, whatever is happening, we’ll make sure you are kept fully informed.

Benefits and Work members can download a 30 page guide to Ways to prevent and overturn ESA and UC sanctions from this page.

Update:  there's more details of the abolition of the WCA and the introduction of the new UC health element here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    micksville · 1 years ago
    Also  the predictions that it will likely or according to Torsten Bell, inevitably be applied only to new claimants that sound? If govt wants young people under 24 on ESA, say with mental health issues to join workforce surely they'll find acway to migrate the current claimants quickly, albeit not hwfore new claimants, over to new system. One assumes Torsten Bell knows his stuff, I am certain B and W do....so I hope these predictions have some credence. Be an interesting day tomorrow
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Bob · 1 years ago
      @colette If you are on ESA income based the migration to UC have been put back to 2028 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      colette · 1 years ago
      @micksville I still receive ESA and im not on UC what happens when I am moved onto UC either with a change in circumstances or just through being moved onto it .?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    micksville · 1 years ago
    Are the predictions of Torsten Bell and B and W that this might take years really that sound. I seem to recall the initial Guardian article predicting this back in January, as referenced by B and W, saying got was keen to get this up and running this year and claimants back into the workplace. Is there not a scenario where govt can fast track this thru parliament on emergency basis?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Elizabeth Vidler · 1 years ago
    No political party is worth voting for now or ever again, they are completly out of touch with the reality of real people's lives, of course Labour are as bad there is no money, except the non dom, which apparently will fund everything oh and of course bash the disabled and over 50s, I just wonder as usual if they have really looked at how this work in the real world and not in some civil servant's mind. They are all clueless.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    clearwater · 1 years ago
    don't for a minute be so gullible to expect labour to be of any help or different if elected........ they are just as bad as the conservative thugs

    Labour's Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Jonathan Ashworth said: "Over recent months, Labour has outlined welfare reforms to get Britain back to work and now the Tories are following our lead."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      trev · 1 years ago
      @clearwater Indeed. Rachel Reeves is on record as saying "if you're living on Benefits Labour is not the party for you."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Shaun · 1 years ago
      @clearwater Labour want to read the whiter paper first so Starmer says surely they will find its faults and highlight them 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Tom · 1 years ago
    This is paving the way for a UBI  system, Which isn't going to end  well Combined  with Digital ID's & CBDC  it will likely morph into a  social credit system like China has
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rachel · 1 years ago
      @Tom You Sir are bang on the money!! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      A EDWARDS · 1 years ago
      @Tom They won't ever pay a ubi,they Don't want to pay us anything at all,they want us to simply not exist anymore 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Fainbrog · 1 years ago
    I also saw suggestions around a piece in the Express (I think) that PIP could become a means tested benefit, despite the assurances that were given in Oct/Nov last year that there were no plans to do so..
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    denby · 1 years ago
    I thank God for Benefits and Work as a news source besides all the other superb stuff. Because I do not have the headspace and time to try for myself to fillet relevant truth from the political hype and blether. So will not upset myself about this unless/until B&W say so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Bob · 1 years ago
      @denby Yea I always rely on this website for all the latest news and support,
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Paws · 1 years ago
      @denby
      I too shall rely on hearing it here first. I am always in panic mode over any benefit related changes.
      We should not have to live this way.
      Being long term sick and being able to prove it repeatedly should speak volumes. I feel ppl think this will all come into play overnight thus raising worry and anxiety, when it's not the case, so we get to breathe for a while. The entire benefit system is in Dire straits,not of our making but of the government's and they know it..

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Porridge · 1 years ago
    Last night (12 March 2023), Torston Bell said on Radio 4 Westminster Hour that in these new rules, people who were temporarily sick, but who were not disabled and claiming PIP, and claiming the sickness related element of UC, would not receive more money than someone just claiming UC but who was not sick. So essentially any extra help provided currently to long epterm sick claimants will come to an end. Aside from this being yet another example of drip-drip confused information about these “reforms”, I am not worrying at this stage because this is going to be put into a White Paper at first and as this government is likely to call for an election this year, is it really likely that these ideas will ever make it into day to day reality for claimants? Probably not, unless Labour takes them up when it wins the next election either alone or in a coalition.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Steve · 1 years ago
      @james It was the Liberal Democrats who bought in universal credit when they got into bed with the  Conservatives When it was a hung Parliament last And on universal credit you are worse off by at least £2000 a year  ThenWhen you are on working tax credit. Universal credit was just an excuse to take money off of claimants. Take it from me any changes that the government are  proposing is not for anyone else's  benefit apart from the government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Pat · 1 years ago
      @james Why don't people vote in a different party they couldn't be any worse there must be an awful lot of people who like the Tories,disabled people are a minority compared to them 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      james · 1 years ago
      @A EDWARDS vote for greens or libdems or snp depending on where you are
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      A EDWARDS · 1 years ago
      @Porridge Moston these ideas are labour ideas I'm afraid, Johnston ashworth is on the same page, it's happening no matter who's in power
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      George · 1 years ago
      @wibblum Agree. Ashworth said he would reform work capabilty tests, meaning they are not listening on what has happened to those with conditions. I hope Starmer replaces him personally. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    wibblum · 1 years ago
    Well as usual, the way the 'abolition' of the WCA is being slanted by the tories is as 'help' to get the disabled (and the elderly) 'back into the workforce' (where it is heavily implied they long to be because anyone who doesn't want to - or more likely simply can't - be in work must surely be a feckless malingerer), and the suggestion that the process will be more or less voluntary is concerning. 

    In my experience of these type of schemes, 'invitation' very quickly turns into 'compulsion' once the tories are satisfied that the general public will swallow the idea and not kick up a fuss. 

    At the risk of my being prevented from ever presenting Match Of The Day in the future, allow me to suggest that this new scheme's slogan should be "Work Will Set You Free!".

We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.