Applications are now open to people who wish to join the Timms review steering group.

The government wants to appoint 12 people to the group and is aiming for the majority to be disabled people.  They say they are “particularly interested to hear from people who are involved with disabled people’s organisations, recognising their unique role in amplifying disabled voices.”

Members are required to commit five days a month to the work.

Payment is £300 a day plus expenses, which will include travel expenses and subsistence

The closing date for applications 30 November 2025.

Essential criteria for applicants are:

  • Knowledge, experience or expertise of disability, long-term health conditions and/or social security-related issues. 
  • Experience being involved in strategic engagement on matters relating to disability, long-term health conditions or social security-related issues. 
  • Experience engaging, supporting or working with disabled people and/or people with long-term health conditions, and/or understanding the issues and barriers they face. 
  • Commitment to working collaboratively and inclusively with people from diverse backgrounds and perspectives. 
  • Ability to evaluate evidence from a range of sources, including qualitative and quantitative data. 
  • Ability to engage with complex policy issues, including difficult trade-offs and financial decisions.

Here at Benefits and Work, we can’t help feeling that the requirement to have been “involved in strategic engagement on matters relating to disability, long-term health conditions or social security-related issues” may rule out a great many prospective applicants. 

In fact, we had to look up what “strategic engagement” meant and we’re still not entirely sure we could define it.  We’d be happy to have readers suggestions and examples below the line.

Applicants are required to write a 500 word statement how you meet the essential criteria and why you would like to be a member of the Timms Review steering group. 

If you are considered for final selection you will be contacted by the Department or co-chairs to discuss your experience and why you want to take part in more detail. This will be an informal conversation, not an interview. 

No feedback will be given to those who are not successful.

For those appointed, there will be a general obligation to maintain the confidentiality of information shared in confidence, but there does not appear to be any intention to impose a more stringent gagging clause of any sort. 

What is certain, however, is that the steering committee will have very little time to make changes that will affect the lives of millions of people.

As the closing date for applications is 30 November, then there is little prospect of a committee being appointed and getting to work before the new year. But it is still the DWP’s intention that the review will be completed by Autumn 2026, with an interim report produced before that.

This means a maximum of around 55 days – just 11 working weeks – for the committee to potentially transform the way that PIP works and who is eligible for it.

We’d be very interested to hear from readers on whether they plan to apply or not and what their reasons are.

Links to details of how to apply and an expression of interest form can be found on this page.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I was in a steering group for Stockport Council well before I received DLA.
    I was on Income Support of £30 a week.
    My dear late wife worked.
    This steering group was a way to silent those with the best ideas for your community.
    We did get a Multi Use Games Area out of it for the children.
    I solely developed a newsletter and website for my estate but someone at the Tenants Association told a load of lies stabbing me in the back.
    There was an attendance of the five people at every tenants meeting until I got involved, numbers swelled to over 50 people and packed out the dingy community centre. We were making progress and residents issues were being sorted.
    We set up a Youth Forum so the children that were accused of vandalism could voice their concerns. Many went from truancy to college and university.
    The newsletter was a monthly affair and those with disabilities unable to attend meetings could submit their concerns on the website or through advocates.
    That was 2007-10. I became so unwell with Syringomyelia that I couldn't do anything more.
    I disappeared into the ether without a concern for me. The tenants association and steering group slowly got dissolved after that because its main competitor was no longer well enough to attend.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I don't trust Timms , the benefits agency or anything remotely connected to the. , we would probably turn up and be told if we can turn up for this , we can turn up for work (I plant my tongue firmly in my cheek)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I am thinking about it, I have a household with everyone with disabilities which can be challenging including myself .  I 'm part of government network groups for people  with disabilities within the civil service. I'm grateful and fortunate  to be given adjustments so I can  stay in employment although I don't how long I will be able to work for should deteriorate. I would love to be a voice for justice for those who are unable to work due to their disabilities. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    As a mother of two adults sons who are several sight impaired and a social worker who works with adults with learning disabilities who often have additional physical, sensory, mental health disabilities and additional needs I would be interested in seeing how this groups functions. 

    I am always concerned that these committees are made up by people who have their own agendas, focuses and biases and only focus on what they know and make blanket statements regarding people with disabilities not seeing the person behind the diagnosis and their unique experience of their disability, and other issues such as living in a rural area, poverty, poor housing etc. 

    I hope I am wrong, but past experience means that I have a strong sense that it will report the evidence that supports their and the government agenda. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Anyone applying for this who is on any kind of benefit can expect to have their accounts scrutinised as part of their application. So if you get PIP they would look at that. Plus if you are successful on getting a role they would remove the £300 payment from your benefit pound for pound if you get UC and this would probably trigger a WCA assessment because they would argue if you can do this you can do any/all forms of work, so the people who know the most and the most lived experience also most harmed by the system will be excluded. Anyone who has had experience of benefits system and been harmed by it knows this
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @wolfchile I recently raised a number of issues regarding the Timms review with my local Labour MP who surprisingly did concede various points and agreed to write to Mr Timms. For example, she agreed that disabled people on benefits who get appointed to the PIP review committee should have the option to be paid in vouchers if they are unable to claim the £300 a day for participation in the group. I also asked her to ask Timms what the term “strategic engagement” meant in the essential criteria for applicants to the review committee.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @wolfchile This is so true. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I will apply today as a long-term member of Benefitsandworks, also a disabled individual, and co-administrator of a Veterans group. I believe I can help. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    It also rules out anyone unable to travel because of their health condition. If you can't leave your home because of phyisical inability, should that exclude your equally valid voice? I think not, especially if they are expecting those people to work as well. Setting up these requirements means the more able will have a voice from their own perspectives and the rest of us have to hope they have enough insight to fully understand the needs of everyone else and advocate for that. It's the wrong standard and will be unfair to those less able.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Mari I agree that a travel requirement rules out a relevant proportion of potential applicants

      I would hope the remote access would be enabled so that the inability to travel is not a barrier
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Some of these requirements potentially preclude an applicant from being eligible for PIP. Being disabled is only a part of the requirements. And those disabled people who are applying are probably much higher functioning in the disabled community. Most disabled people cannot commit to anything long term or even day to day because of how their conditions affect them. In fact they are trying to recruit with very high requirements that many disabled people won’t have and which would not look out of place in middle management recruitment or above. I want to see a cross section of disabled applicants, but then that would probably mean more reasonable adjustments they would not want to make. I’m not qualified for what they need despite being a disabled person.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Do these groups have any power? I seem to remember an access to work one and they still are cutting the funding and making it harder for people to stay in work. You can make all recommendations you want but if they ignore them after..
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I wonder if applying for this might trigger a WCA :(
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I plan of applying as it is essential that this committee has disabled people who are on benefits as members of it. We cannot trust this government at all and it needs people who are prepared to speak out and challenge Timms in meetings. It is no good having a committee of yes people. As a former union steward of 14 years I believe that I have the experience and determination to stand up for disabled people's rights. I would of course, be prepared to be a whistle blower and leak information from this committee if it was in the public interest. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @bronc You could be sent too the tower of london for whistleblowing.