The DWP have refused a Freedom of Information request by Benefits and Work for a copy of the draft version of the previously secret report on the unmet needs of disabled claimants.

‘The uses of health and disability benefits’ report was finally published last month.  Although it was damning in itself of the failure to pay disabled claimants enough to meet their basic needs, there was evidence that it had in fact been watered down.

The Disability News Service was told by a whistleblower that the original version of the report was sent back to the authors by the DWP with instructions to reduce the number of references to “unmet needs” and to delete some of its analysis.

Although the DWP have admitted they do have a copy of an earlier draft of the report they are refusing to release it to us.

The DWP are claiming that two exemptions under the Freedom of Information act apply to the report:  regulations 36(2)(b) and 36(2)(c)

Regulation 36(2)(b) applies where the release of the information would inhibit

i) the free and frank provision of advice, or

(ii) the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation,

Regulation 36(2)(c) applies where release:

(c) would otherwise prejudice, or would be likely otherwise to prejudice, the effective conduct of public affairs.

The DWP claim that “The information contained includes details that would not be designed, in any shape or form to be released with the final version.”

But we would argue that the authors absolutely did intend the report to be published in that form, it was simply that the DWP found the information embarrassing or contrary to the image of welfare benefits that they wished to promote.

The DWP also argue that:  “The Government Social Research protocol states that the agreed final draft is the product for publication.”

Yet the DWP entirely ignored this protocol when they refused repeatedly to publish the report.  In the end it was the Commons work and pensions committee who obtained a copy from the authors and published it on their website.

So, we would argue that the DWP cannot now rely on that protocol when they have failed to follow it themselves.

The DWP also argue that:  “If we had to always release draft reports, there is a chance that the overall consultation, research and report stages of any such work would become poorer. The reason for this is that people would be less inclined to comment or have their opinions recorded, meaning that the development of these reports would suffer.”

But we are not asking for every draft report to be published or for a decision that would set any sort of precedent for other cases.

We are simply arguing that, in this specific case, there is an overwhelming public interest in knowing in what ways the DWP altered the findings of the report. 

It is possible that by giving a misleading impression of how difficult disabled claimants find it to meet their basic needs, the DWP are paving the way for benefits changes that could be life-threatening for some claimants.

Given the seriousness of the issue and the fact that the DWP have chosen not to follow government  protocols in this specific case, there are good grounds for publishing the draft report.

This is the case that we have now put to the DWP, who will no doubt still refuse to release the draft.  It is also the case we will then put to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Paco · 5 months ago
    Thank you for diligent work in bringing us this information. Why are the DWP allowed to commission a report into their own failings? The whole department is clearly unfit for purpose so why can't the Commons work & pensions Committee (or any other Gov't dept) launch their own investigation into the woeful running of this dept? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Kay · 5 months ago
    The DWP act like they are in charge of their own totalitarian world. What they say goes and with no consequences. With regard to them dismissing any link with the way they treat claimants and suicidal thoughts or even worse to carry it through.....well I have the thought T Shirt. How dare they they treat us with such contempt. It Al stems and flows from those at the top....privileged and ill informed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    tintack · 5 months ago
    Any claimant accused of just a small fraction of the dishonesty and deviousness routinely displayed by the DWP would find themselves sanctioned into starvation at the drop of a hat.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jules · 5 months ago
    Thank you for doing this. Let me know if I can help.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Nick · 5 months ago
    DWP should put more effort into sorting out the benefits system,  making the process easier to navigate and stopping crippling sanctions on those less able to fight back. Instead they seem to take great satisfaction in‘fiddling the figures’, blocking Freedom of Information requests and generally throwing an impenetrable smoke screen around themselves. Disgraceful. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.