Labour is struggling to contain a rebellion by its own MPs over benefits cuts, the Guardian has reported.

According to a Guardian report on 17 April the government is offering MPs unhappy with the cuts the chance to abstain or even simply miss the vote altogether, without any threat of punishment.

Backbenchers claim there are now 55 MPs prepared to rebel at the vote and another 100 who are still considering their position.

The bill to introduce the 4-point rule for PIP and abolish the WCA was expected to be introduced in May, but has now slipped back to early June, giving campaigners a little more time to organise opposition.

According to a further report in the Guardian on 20 April Labour is trying to buy off rebels by offering money to reduce child poverty just before the vote.

But Labour MP Rachel Maskell, told the Guardian

“You can’t compromise with a trade-off under which you say you will take more children from poor families out of poverty by placing more disabled people into poverty. That simply cannot be right.

“The government really does need to start listening to MPs, civil society and the population at large because there is really widespread opposition to these policies.”

And another Labour MP, Neil Duncan-Jordan, who won his seat with a majority of just 18 votes but who has 5,000 constituents receiving PIP, told the paper “There is not a hierachy of need.  The whole policy is wrong. It goes without saying that if these benefits cuts go through, I will be toast in this seat.”

Duncan-Jordan is also unhappy that MPs are being asked to vote on the changes before they the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) reports on how effective they are likely to be in returning people to the workplace.  The OBR will deal with this issue in its next forecast, due in the Autumn.

More information about the effects of Labour’s policy are being uncovered by campaigners with each passing week. Such as the fact that almost nine out of ten current  PIP standard daily living awards fail the new test or that 77% of all award for arthritis and 62% of cardiovascular disease awards will fail the new test.

The more that Labour MPs can be made aware of these facts, the more they are likely to realise that what the government told them the cuts are about and what they are really about are two very different things.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    There needs to be a public rebellion over this , we need to organise a march to stand up against this , the unions need to get things going -strangely, they have been very quiet over this 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    Abstaining isn’t good enough - they need to vote against. I am still shocked that none of the MPs have left Labour yet.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Anon Abstaining what a political get out of jail card that is. We need to make sure that we Abstain from voting for them the next come grovelling for our votes.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    I thought this post was about something positive, that Labour is struggling to contain a rebellion. GOOD!

    Therefore, in keeping with what this post is about. 

    I wish there were a lot more Labour MP's like Ian Duncan-Jordan he has certainly been pro-active in his stance against the Reforms.

    Does anybody actually KNOW approximately how many MP's are likely to be against the reforms, at this stage in this protracted process?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Epic cringe moment
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @bert Indeed he did. His exact words when leader of the Tories were "The quiet man is here to stay and he's turning up the volume!"
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Didnt Ian Duncan -Smith say this quiet mans not for turning.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Anon Apparently so. 

      I just looked up Ian Duncan-Smith on Wikipedia. The Ian part is spelt Iain. Unless there's a third Duncan double barrelled MP...

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Cecelia He was quietly compassionate compared to this lot.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    Just had a preparatory call for my meeting with the Carers All Party Parliamentary Group on 7th May in Westminster. Their feeling is that these cuts will go ahead, but they also (Carer's UK and the APPG) hope is that mitigations can be won. I don't think we should give up hope of a total upending of these proposals though. I say fight to win. 
    I'll have 5 - 7 minutes to speak to the APPG. 
    They also asked me if i'd agree to be part of the wider Carer's UK campaign. No one wants their face splashed everywhere but i'll do it if my husband agrees, as this ugly fight needs to be had. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Gingin I wasn't sure if this was the same one you are attending, gingin.  Clearly it isn't so that's good!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Mick It’s not the same thing. The one I’m going to is organised by Carers UK and it’s a group of MPs and peers with loads of expertise and experience of carer issues, who are unanimously against the cuts 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @gingin

      You might want to read this gingin, the APPG doesn't look like it will help any, quite the opposite by the sound of it!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    How many people here are signed up the virtual meetings about the consultations? I'm on for the first one.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Slb I'm going to the DWP consultation in Leeds on 21st May. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Slb I'm signed up for the 3rd June one in Cardiff
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    I'm resigned to the fact that some of these proposals which are in the Green Paper are going to get through. My only hope is some of them will be watered down. If that happens I'll take that as a win.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Anon Sorry I went mad. I came on yesterday + I felt a vulnerable person who had posted about their worries + was more or less being told to give up + accept.it by 3 names + nothing is a done deal just now. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Dave Hello Snapsy. Nice to see you are taking a break from snapping today.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @YogiBear Don't give up yet. There is still a long way for this to go yet + a lot can happen in that time.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    The dreaded brown envelope has arrived - i have until the 17th of July to migrate to UC from ESA Support Group and Housing Benefit.  Yikes!! Not looking forward to this one bit.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Thanks for the information.
      I think we might be getting somewhere at long last. Last Thursday DWP phoned  to say they will now be sending an officer out to see him + he won't lose his ESA before seeing someone. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Dave You have to fill in the online form (long winded but not difficult)  and when you can finally post in the journal, put a message about migration being from ESA support group to the UC LCWRA and that he is bed bound and not able to leave the house.

      Is your concern about him having to go to the local jobcentre to prove his identity? You can upload ID online when completing the form. 

      Fill in form, upload ID, message in journal about being bed bound and job's a gud'un.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Daniel Congratulations Daniel, pleased for you. 
      My partners uncle is about to migrate over + I hope they transfer him just as smoothly as they have with you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Sick and Tired Don’t worry , I’ve just been migrated over from ESA to UC it was very straightforward, and haven’t lost a penny . 
      I’ve been on ESA since it was Incapacity for 30 years due to my disability. 
      I was terrified by thought of going on to UC but nothing has changed , still get paid the same amount , every two weeks . There was no time where I was left without money , despite what I had read . I’m not saying things don’t happen to others , just trying to reassure you , that it’s not all doom and gloom , and being honest , I wouldn’t have known anything about transition . 
      You get a phone call if you’re in support group , just to confirm who you are , and then they tell you, as you’re in support group , you will not need to attend any interviews or job searches as you are exempt. 
      Hope that helps 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Lisa Lisa, can you please explain how you got officers to call + help you please? My partners uncle is nearly bed bound + he has been told to migrate to Universal credit from ESA in the 1st week of May his ESA ends. We are getting nowhere with the  DWP, they have suggested he goes to the  Job Centre to find the support to make his claim. They are fully aware he is nearly bed bound, are the DWP expecting someone to push hs bed to the Job Centre? Even our MP Lucy Powell is not getting very far with these people. We are worried about him. A couple of years ago the DWP did send an officer out to deal with his PIP + they even agreed he was in a bad way. My partner has now written to the MP + asked her to arrange for Stammer, Rachel Reeves  + Kendall to call out + push him to the Job Centre.
      Can you please give us some advice?  Without the ESA he will simply only have his Pip to live on.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Why Labour's plans for getting disabled people into employment will not succeed

    This morning, after a medical appointment, I came into work to find that management want me to fill in a spreadsheet on a daily basis to document the amount of work I have done against their set targets.

    If you are blind/partially sighted, and use assistive technology, you will NEVER be as quick as one who has normal vision and can scan multiple screens at the same time.  It means, eventually, the capability road which eventually can lead to redundancy.

    Employers will only take on the disabled if they think they will be as productive as their able bodied counterparts, which, of course, they will not.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Tania Resentment - a lot, I suspect. Ditto Rayner
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus What a great name! Trouble in ancient Rome as well?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Cecelia Maybe they believe disabled people have the skills non disabled don't have. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Matt It has never really been about getting people back or into work This is just a cost saving exercise 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Matt They don’t care about you going into work, it is just to force you to get less money. It also massages their numbers to show lower number of economically inactive.

      Forcing you to spend x amount of time job searching - even when knowing you are too unwell to take. The job searching commitments can be overwhelming psychologically too. Regular sanctions and worry about them wont help.

      If they were genuine about helping serious mental health sufferers into work, they would not have frozen funding for mental health services - which is already dire.

      They are, however, setting up expensive counter-fraud units.

      Fail to mention less than 1% of claims checked were fraudulent. More were DWP errors, you have to pay for. Nor £16bn in unclaimed benefits.  

      This govt is a con.

      Journalists are being charged under counter terrorism if they report anything negative about 17,000 dead children in a war.

      £bns on facial recognition, bank accounts spying, social media, and so on, is intrusive.

      Democracies allow rights, the freedom of thought and expression.

      Violation of human rights is destroying ours.

      He cites his brother and mother’s disabilities - wonder if there was some resentment there growing up.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago

    This bit sums them up perfectly:

    "Ministers are privately ruling out scrapping the two-child benefit cap despite warnings from charities that a failure to do so could result in the highest levels of child poverty since records began.

    Government sources said charities and Labour MPs who were concerned that wider benefit cuts would push more families into poverty should “read the tea leaves” over Labour’s plans.

    “If they still think we’re going to scrap the cap then they’re listening to the wrong people. We’re simply not going to find a way to do that. The cap is popular with key voters, who see it as a matter of fairness,” one source said."

    So, a policy with disastrous real world consequences is here to stay "because it's popular with key voters, who see it as a matter of fairness". I don't suppose it's occurred to them to point out to these "key voters" that far from being fair, it's a policy that inflicts poverty on huge numbers of kids who have done nothing to deserve it? They could point to.......oh, I don't know, maybe the evidence showing that kids are getting shorter because of poverty-induced malnutrition. Or doctors raising the alarm about the return of Victorian-era diseases like rickets. 

    Ah! But no, I forgot - that would involve challenging voters' ill-informed prejudices. And why do that when it's so much easier to pander to them? 

    This government is not just malevolent, it's also politically incompetent. They are obsessed with chasing the votes of hard right lunatics who would never vote for them while actively doing everything they can to alienate progressive voters, i.e. their own base. The result is that the hard right crazies still won't vote for them - why vote for the imitation when you can vote for the original? - while progressive voters are deserting Labour for other parties, notably the Greens. Labour's vote is through the floor, so it's not as if this right wing nonsense is actually getting them anywhere. Maybe they should "read the tea leaves". 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @tintack I read somewhere (which I can't be bothered to look for right now) that the OBR's forecast is the country doesn't have the money to scrap the two-kids benefit cap. But the country does have money to pay the OBR to tell the country it has no money. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @rookie The way Rachel Reeves + Stammer are going, it's only a matter of time now before the unions all withdraw their support of Labour. But of course by the time Rachel Reeves is over there won't be Labour Party left.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I am one of the 13% on Enhanced who will lose PIP and the ill health UC payment. I am medically retired and have been in the Support Group for 14 years. I will lose 10K+. 
    I received my UC Migration letter last week to add to the joy. That’s an additional 3K loss… 
    It’s abuse. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @ANGELA You might keep health topup, as there is a 2nd way to get it if you already have LCWRA prior to 2026, however you must keep LCWRA with no gap until the WCA is removed.  Most news places, youtubers etc. havent mentioned it, but its in the green paper.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus Don't get like i did ( talking to everyone whos panicking),I let it get to me in April last year with sunaks speech,it took 5 months of constant worry and stress to cause me to have a nervous breakdown in September, I couldn't swallow food,I couldn't stop having night time panic attacks, I couldn't go out,i lost my voice for 5 months, the consultant told me it was all stress related after a camera was put down to check for cancer came back clear,I knew it was stress over this,my voice has only just returned,I ended up on sleeping tablets and increased daily propanolol,I knew this was inevitable and I couldn't switch my brain off around pip cuts ,I have now accepted that we are going to lose everything almost 12k a year,I don't know how we're gunna manage but I can not carry on down a path of self destruction worrying about this any more,I have to hope a solution is found until then all I can do is ignore it and concentrate on something more positive in my life,it's all I can do,and it's worse than I ever imagined, I thought I would at least retain my cont based esa,  now that's unlikely aswell,my medical retirement pension and husbands wages combined just won't cut it at all.life is just too expensive and my ability to work or my caring needs won't change, the only thing that will change is that we will be flung into absolute poverty 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Ilo I was referring to the money paid by the DWP. It's not possible to say how much people will pay in council tax because each council has its own policy. Boston Borough Council are one of the few in the country to offer 100% council tax support to UC claimants (as long as it's the only source of income).

      I am aware other councils have shitter rules about who qualifies for support.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Depends doesn't it. We lost £440 because we now need to pay 25% council tax which we didn't before. The existing Council Tax Benefit was cancelled and the 'new' Council Tax Benefit doesn't cover 100% unless you use a wheelchair in the house, have a spare room for a live in carer or a room for dialysis. That's Leeds City Council.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @ANGELA Please try not to panic! We lost so many to sui when the cuts from 2008 onwards came in. I know its hard not to - back then I was being treated for a tumour that had a neurological side effect of anxiety so I know how hard it can be not to spiral but if we panic we can't fight back as effectively.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I am disabled and this 4 point rule will make me homeless. At this point, my life will be no longer worth living.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @John Sadly many are in the same boat, absolutely cruelty from this government, and to think Keir used the word Moral as well.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @John Please John, don't despair + lose hope. This bill in parliment has not passed yet + there is a chance it might never happen. 

      If you are worried about your money, please contact the CAB for help. Don't let this disgusting ill thought plan get you down. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @John Further to my comments above, the amount of mandatory reconsiderations and tribunals getting overturned is 100% evidence that the DWP are robbing everyone of points in various activities.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @John It took Mental Health professionals over a year to convince me that my physical disabilities are not a bourdon to society. Well, as I said above, this 4 point rule will make me homeless, proving that my physical disabilities are indeed a bourdon to society.

      The DWP robbed me of many points an my award. They gave me a maximum of 2 points in activities that I should have been awarded 8 points. This is why so many severely disables people will be effected by the 4 point rule.

      If the DWP was not so zealous in robbing points from the disabled, then this 4 point rule would not have such a big impact on severely disabled people. The 2 of them together will ruin all of us severely disabled people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @John So sorry to hear that, @John. Try not to despair - the changes may never happen, and you might, in any case, get the one 4 point score you need when you are reviewed.

      Meanwhile, go to an advice centre if you can, and explain your circumstances so they can help you get those points in future, and they can also relay your situation and add your voice to the growing objections to the cuts. You are not powerless.

      The government needs to know what the real life consequences of the cuts would be for those "close to the realities of human fragility" as our Prime Minister so eloquently puts it when it suits him.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    When pip was formed and passed into law they also done the maths of how much people need to live on by law. And what was passed would of been the bare minimum.

    And now they are burning that legislation of how much you need to live on, you cant live on less of that calculated amount was then or now, bills rates rent weekly cost of living ect ect.

    What on earth is number 10 and 11 and kendle thinking.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Anon It's actually to give you the same standard of basic living as someone who doesn't have a disability. That is the definition of PIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @James Totally agree James, a lot are sociopaths lacking empathy, remorse and conscience. As they say you can judge a nation on how they treat their vulnerable, this government is treating the vulnerable like something they stepped in including the farmers, pensioners, disabled, young people with mental health struggles etc etc. They really are shooting themselves in the foot as I can never see them gracing number 10 again after this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @A They have very little Christianity or charity in them to help the sick and disabled and are there for the rich and not the poor!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @A @A, that's what I believe - they haven't worked it out. They're too stupid and/or haven't done enough work to realise they've gone too far and would leave some people below what even the government has set as the basic amount to survive.

      The interaction of all the benefits in the welfare system is so complex the architects of these proposals have no idea of the consequences. It may well be Reeves and the gang are cruel, don't care etc, but it's the unworkability of the proposals which will have to lead to their serious overhaul. There are people on means tested benefits who simply would not be able to work their way out of the losses incurred, because of the deductions of income applied to those benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @A No, that only applies to income related benefits, not pip. Pip is extra money to cover the costs arising from disability/illness, 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Reeves is looking to pitch poor parents against disabled claimants. She claims there is no money hence needing to rob pensioners and the disabled. Where else would the money for poor parents come from? Meanwhile you have the likes of the Net Zero minister taking flights here there and everywhere and no doubt getting them paid for. They’re all corrupt. The lot of them. It’s was bad enough with the snouts in the trough tories. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    This is literally a matter of Life and Death.
    There are no grey areas on this one.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @manny26 Totally agree Manny and shame on them, callous in the extreme.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I’m not suggesting for second that we stop protesting on Labour welfare reforms
    But looking at the bigger picture how many of you think there will be a u turn on this policy before its through and the plans will be scrapped?
    My partner Tim thinks there is u turn going to happen on it. Last night he did bit of research on previous governments doing u turns on a policy and looks from history that David Cameron government did the least u turns and he did 1 on the pasty tax and scrapped it the day before it became law. He scrapped it after wide criticism from the bakers and public.
    In comparison Labour Kier Stammer has done the most u turns since he took over leadership after Corbyn.
    The biggest u turn was done by the Tories on the poll tax that was introduced and became law by Thatcher and immediately was scrapped by the Tories again when she was forced out of Downing St.

    Forget party politics for a minute but most MPs remember who actually put them there and voted for them and the very same people can quickly take that seat off them again at the next election.
    How many Labour MPs are going to be able to look at their constituents in the eye at the next election and confirm they completely ignored their last manifesto and they actually voted in favour to make their own constituents lot poorer and they want the very same people to now forget that and vote for them again.
    Remember Labour manifesto last year promised to end poverty and end homelessness. So Liz Kendall and Kier Stammer and Rachel Reeves answer to this problem is to throw over a million more people at the problem they promised to end.
    Richard Burgon Labour MP petition against welfare reform said he wants at least 50000 signatures to his petition to present it in parliament at the vote, he is an MP and he will have idea how many signatures he needs. Today the signature total stands above the 50000 mark.
    The original plan was MPs would vote in early May now that vote has been delayed till June, why? If Labour leaders thought the vote amongst MPs was going to get through easily, then why not vote for it in May after all Labour has got the majority seats? Tim my partner thinks Kier Stammer and Rachel Reeves now realise they might lose that vote in parliament. There is no guarantee amongst other patys that they would vote for it. Assumption amongst the public the Tory MPs would probably vote for it, but the fact is who knows if they would vote for it? Rishi Sunak went into the election last year promising to make large cuts to the welfare thinking it be popular with voters and he lost the election. Think Kier Stammer came up with this plan to try and jump into bed with Tory newspapers Mail Telegraph Express but what he didn’t think the Tory press will stay faithful to the Torys okay those newspapers might flirt a bit with Reform, but the thought of jumping into ned with Labour repulses them. The likes of the Mail Telegraph Express are counting the days to the next election and dreaming of Labour falling flat.
    All the press be it Labour or Tory are full of the infighting in Labour over the plans. Labour has agreed their whips are struggling to get Labour MPs to agree to it, so Labour has even agreed to let its MPs to abstain from the vote.
    Tim read that loads of Labour MPs in the red wall areas are now fearing they will be toast at the next election if their constituents start to lose their Pips.
    Several big name charities and NHS have warned the government against these disability cuts.
    Also read Ed Davey of Lib Dems his son is disabled and these cuts could harm him, so are the Lib Dems Mps likely to vote for something that could effect their own leader?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Jane I think both Labour + the Tories have completely failed this country now.

      I think it is now time for this 2 party fiasco to end.
      We seriously need a completely diffrent political party in charge of the UK.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Greg. Scopes petition is at 91,977. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Greg. I think the difference here is the Tories and Reform agree with the cuts, in fact want them to go further. There is no strong party holding the govt to account
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    So will this affect if it’s passed all new claims and reviews when due and are ongoing claims not affected until reviews are due please can someone explain thanks
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Rebbie Just happened to me x
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @SLB Husbands review is November 2027...suppose he'll get his letter in November 2026. He does have 2 4 points...if that changes at review we will fight it. Let's face it, anything could happen. Don't trust the DWP. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @SLB Or conveniently reduce your points when you have scored 4 in just one particular activity on last review,that will also happen 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Mike @Mike, just as you say, new claims and reviews when due and ongoing claims not affected until reviews are due.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Mike It will not come into force until November 2026.  Presumably that will apply to new claims AND reassessments started AFTER that date.   That's what's happened in the past.  It would be a logistical nightmare to use the new rules on assessments already in the system, so to speak.  Not least because people could claim that DWP were dragging their heels in the process to make sure they fall under the new rules.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Starmer, Reeves and Kendall will rely on the Tories to vote it through but a rebellion will damage the government. Again this will need two pieces of legislation, a money bill to change/cut and primary legislation to change eligibility. 

    This saga is NOT a done deal and there will be legal apparatus' used regardless if legislation passes or not. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @SpasticusAutisticus But even if Stammer resigned tonight, there wouldn't be a General Election, it would go over to Angela Raynor. Stammer has made such a mess, I couldn't imagine Labour wanting to call a General Election now, they wouldn't hang onto one seat.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Ilo Sorry llo I don't know how I missed your post.

      But if Stammer goes, wouldn't he be replaced by Angela Raynor as the deputy PM. I couldn't imagine Labour would even want a General Election now, considering the mess Stammer + Rachel Reeves is making.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Hightower "Do people go under more than one name on this site?"

      Yes.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Dave Depends who he is replaced with if that happens
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Dave The Lords have said they support it
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I have written to my labour mp this morning, as follows:
    I’ve been a member of the Labour Party for a long time, I can’t really envisage voting for anybody else, but a few weeks ago I cancelled my membership.
    Why? I couldn’t stand the decision they have taken towards disabled people, and the benefit cuts. I worked very hard in my earlier life, but developed a disability, and I really thought I wouldn’t have to worry about being stripped of income under a new labour government. My claim survived all sorts of unfortunate and unsympathetic characters, as Secretary of State, but now my friends and myself, have an odds on chance of losing our independence and means to support ourselves. Further the mechanism used to differentiate the deserving from the undeserving, is terrible. The pip system is so much up for interpretation in implication that it produces a total lottery of outcome.

    It’s not just the decision, it’s that it’s been specifically selected as the least important priority in government that is my issue. I’m not looking to just make a moan, I really hope changes are possible in this legislation, and that you will fight for mitigations. For instance those continuing with over 8 points, but no 4 point score, to be eligible for a transitional relief payment, as was arranged through the Motability scheme some years back. I’m not apposed to Improvements to the system, but this change is not how the point system was designed to work , and the modification is purely to eliminate acceptance. Worst of all this narrative that’s it about getting people back to work. It makes people who could never work, very upset, guilty, and worried.

    If labour won’t help the most vulnerable, I have to wonder who they are for, and hence my membership decision. It is always a justification for pensioners that they deserve special treatment because they can’t change their circumstances of age. Thats my position with disability, I can’t change my position, and it really worries me.

    I’m much less interested in what governments say, than what they do. I very much hope you will support me with this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Mel My email is primarily a political one about labour  saving money on the backs of people who need all the help they get. The ‘cut’ to save money is going to affect some disabilities far worse than others I suspect, and that probably won’t be known until it happens. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @M I am voting Greens in local elections, will never vote Labour again
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @M Excellent email, M.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @M I'm afraid you lost me at "undeserving" None of us are safe while we allow them to use rhetoric like this. Half of all PIP claims are denied, anyone who makes it through are most definitely eligible.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Labour MPS need to grow a back bone abstaining from voting against benefit cuts not good enough. They need to send a clear message to starmer and Liz Kendall that they won't back the cuts by voting a clear NO. Listen to their conscience.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon I agree. The big majority is a shame, as a smaller one could have forced this to be rethought. Still I’m hopeful it may get amended. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Sid Abstaining is as much of a betrayal as voting for it.