A final word

We'll be following up on all of this over the coming days and weeks and clarifying changes to the WCA as they become clearer. 

But having read the comments below, we'd just like to clarify that what the DWP appear to be saying is that if you are currently in the support group for ESA or the LCWRA group for UC then you will never be assessed again unless you report a change in your condition or you are suspected of fraud. 

The only exception to this is people who have LCWRA/support group status because of pregnancy or cancer treatment, as these are expected to be short-term.

If you are migrated from ESA to UC in the future, this won't make a difference because you are not reassessed as part of the migration process.

We don't know what affect the proposed abolition of the WCA might have on all of this. But that is a Conservative proposal which is an awfully long way from becoming a reality and it may well not survive first contact with an incoming government.  It's definitely not something to lose sleep over for a good few years.

In the meantime, after all the menace and rumour in the media over recent weeks, we hope this allows many of our readers to feel a little reassured tonight.


Most people with LCWRA will never face a WCA reassessment again

The DWP response to the WCA consultation says that most people who have been assessed as having limited capability for work-related activity will never have to be assessed again. 

The DWP say

. . . we will bring forward a new offer - a Chance to Work Guarantee for existing claimants on UC and ESA with LCWRA. This change will be effective from 2025, at the same time as WCA changes are introduced. This change will in effect abolish the WCA for the vast majority of this group, bringing forward a key element of our White Paper proposals and giving people the confidence to try work.

9. These changes will mean that almost all people who are currently assessed as having LCWRA will never face a WCA reassessment again. Reassessments will only take place under very limited circumstances, which are:

  • When a claimant reports a change of circumstances in their health condition;
  • If a claimant has been awarded LCWRA for pregnancy risk, or cancer treatment where the prognosis for recovery is expected to be short-term;
  • If a claimant has been declared as having LCWRA under the new risk provisions; and
  • In cases of suspected fraud.

10. For the overwhelming majority of existing UC claimants, this is a guarantee that they will not be reassessed if they try work, and it does not work out. ESA claimants undertaking permitted work will also not be reassessed. Therefore, for both groups, we will remove the barrier that trying work may mean they lose their LCWRA entitlement

 DWP response to the WCA consultation published

The DWP response to the WCA consultation has now been published.  They received 1,348 responses, which appear to have been overwhelmingly negative.

No changes will be made to:

Coping with social engagement

Continence


DWP say most existing claimants will not be affected

The DWP say in their press release that the new changes will not be introduced until 2025 and that most existing claimants will not be affected:

"These changes will not affect existing claimants whose circumstances remain the same, reflecting the need to ensure a continuity of service for them, and will mean that these claimants will not lose money as a result of the changes."

Elsewhere, they add:

  • Under these changes, most existing claimants on health benefits will not need to be re-assessed with a new Work Capability Assessment. Re-assessments will only take place under limited circumstances, which are:

    When a claimant reports a change of circumstances in their health condition;

    If a claimant has been awarded LCWRA for pregnancy risk, or cancer treatment where the prognosis for recovery is expected to be short-term;

    In cases of suspected fraud.

Changes to the substantial risk rule

In their consultation on WCA changes in September, the DWP suggested that the substantial risk rule could be changed as follows:

Alter the rule so that it would not apply where a person could take part in tailored or a minimal level of work preparation activity and/or where reasonable adjustments could be put in place to enable that person to engage with work preparation.

This appears to be what the DWP is now planning to do.


Getting about

The current points for 'Getting about' are shown below. These are to be reduced although we don't know what to yet:

15. Getting about

 15 (a) Cannot get to any place outside the claimant’s home with which the claimant is familiar.  15 points 

15 (b) Is unable to get to a specified place with which the claimant is familiar, without being accompanied by another person 9 points

15 (c) Is unable to get to a specified place with which the claimant is unfamiliar without being accompanied by another person.  6 points

 15 (d) None of the above apply.  0 points


The removed mobilising descriptors

It appears that the DWP plan to stop the following mobilising descriptors allowing claimants to be places in the support/LCWRA group.  These descriptors will still score 15 points for the purposes of limited capability for work, but will not allow access to the support/LCWRA group:

1.  Mobilising unaided by another person with or without a walking stick, manual wheelchair or other aid if such aid is normally, or could reasonably be, worn or used.

Cannot either:

(i)  mobilise more than 50 metres on level ground without stopping in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion

or

(ii)  repeatedly mobilise 50 metres within a reasonable timescale because of significant discomfort or exhaustion.


 Changes to the WCA revealed  

A DWP press release has set out the changes they plan to make to the WCA:

  1. Remove the ‘Mobilising’ part of the assessment that currently places people into a group where no work preparation is required – this will reflect that many of the claimants with these issues in the modern world of work will be able to undertake some work or work preparation with the right support
  2. Amend the regulations that determine whether mental health issues are assessed as putting claimants at ‘Substantial Risk’ if they are required to undertake any level of work preparation - these amendments will realign the regulations with the original intention of applying only in exceptional circumstances, whilst still protecting and safeguarding the most vulnerable
  3. Reduce the points awarded for some of the Limited Capability for Work (LCW) ‘getting about’ descriptors, reflecting the rise of flexible and home working opportunities in modern workplaces.

Over 90% of people denied LCWRA will not move into work

Although the Chancellor announced today that there will be changes to the WCA, we don't know which of the changes set out in their consultation in September they have decided to adopt.

What we do know, however, thanks to the Office for Budget responsibility. is that the claims that the changes are to help people move into work are bogus.

The OBR has published its estimate of the changes to the incapacity caseload as a result of WCA reform.

By 2028/29 they estimate that there will be: 

315,000 fewer people in the UC LCWRA group

56,000 fewer in the ESA support group

Making a total of 371,000 fewer people who get incapacity benefits without having any work related conditions.

But at the same time, they estimate that as a result there will be:

290,000 more people on LCW UC 

51,000 more people in the ESA WRAG 

Making a total increase of 342,000 (possibly some rounding) who have conditions applied to their benefit.

 

 

So, the OBR are expecting around 29,000 people, just 8% of claimants who are denied LCWRA/support group, to actually move off benefits as a result.  The other 92% will stay on incapacity benefits but just be around £400 a month worse off and subject to sanctions.

Thanks to Tom Pollard for tweeting about this.


 

Half a million people to be offered mental health treatment

The chancellor says they will halve the flow of people signed off work with no work search requirements:

Over 180,000 more people will be helped through the Universal Support programme and nearly 500,000 people will be offered treatment for mental health conditions and employment support. 

Over the forecast period, the OBR judge these measures will more than halve the flow of people who are signed off work with no work search requirements.

At the same time we’ll provide a further £1.3 billion of funding to offer extra help to the 300,000 people who have been unemployed for over a year without any sickness or disability.

But we will ask for something in return.

If, after 18 months of intensive support, jobseekers have not found a job, we’ll roll out a programme requiring them to take part in mandatory work placements to increase their skills and improve their employability.

And if they choose not to engage with the work search process for six months, we will close their case and stop their benefits.

Taken together with the labour supply measures I have announced in the spring, the OBR say we will increase the number of people in work by around 200,000 at the end of the forecast period,  permanently increasing the size of the economy.


WCA to be 'reformed'

The chancellor confirmed that changes are to be made to the work capability assessment (WCA) and to the fit note process, though no further details were given about the precise changes to the WCA.

The Chancellor said:

Every year we sign off over 100,000 people onto benefits with no requirement to look for work, because of sickness or disability.

That waste of potential is wrong economically and wrong morally.

So, with the secretary of state for work and pensions, I announced our back to work plan. 

We will reform the fit note process so that treatment rather than time off becomes the default.

We will reform the work capability assessment to reflect greater flexibility and availability of homeworking after the pandemic.

And we’ll spend £1.3 billion over the next 5 years to help nearly 700,000 people with health conditions find jobs.


LCWRA element of Universal Credit (UC) from April 2024

We've calculated the 6.7% uprating for the LCWRA element of Universal Credit for next April as follows:

LCWRA element of UC up from £390.06 by £26.13 to £416.19


PIP rates from April 2024

We've calculated the 6.7% uprating for PIP for next April as follows:

Daily living standard rate up from £68.10 by £4.56 to £72.66

Daily living enhanced rate up from £101.75 by £6.82 to £108.57

Mobility standard rate up from £26.90 by £1.80 to £28.70

Mobility enhanced rate up from £71.00 by £4.76 to £75.76


Pensions triple lock maintained

 

The Chancellor announced that from April 24th "we will increase the full new state pension by 8.5% to £221.20 a week, worth up to £900 more a year."


Local Housing Allowance to be unfrozen

The Chancellor announced that he will "increase the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) to the 30th percentile of local market rents.  This will give 1.6 million households an average of £800 of support."


Benefits to be uprated by September CPI

Good news on uprating.  The chancellor has confirmed that in April 2024 benefits will be uprated by September's Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rate of inflation, which stood at 6.7%.  There had been speculation that benefits would be uprated by the lower October rate.


Autumn statement updates

The Chancellor delivers his Autumn statement at around 12.30pm on 22 November 2023.

Benefits and Work will be providing updates on this page on how the Autumn statement affects claimants, as information becomes available.

In the meantime, heavy hints are being dropped by the government about what may be in it.

Claimants in LCWRA may have to look for work from home

A number of media outlets are suggesting that claimants who are in the Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) group will be required to look for work they can do at home or lose the LCWRA element, worth £4,680 a year. 

This is likely to be a follow up on the consultation on changes to the work capability assessment (WCA), which took place in September.

If this does go ahead, it is unlikely to happen before the next general election and so may be cancelled by an incoming government.

Cut in benefits uprating

Benefits are normally uprated in April by the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rate for the previous September.

But there have been numerous suggestions that benefits may be uprated by the lower CPI rate for October 2023 of 4.7% rather than the September rate which was higher at  6.7%.

This may apply to UC and ESA but may not apply to PIP.

Back To Work Plan

We already know quite a lot about the ‘Back to Work’ plan which involves tougher sanctions and mandatory work placements for some UC claimants.  More details may be released as part of the Autumn statement.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    • Additionally, the Government has decided that future DWP-led reassessments will take
    place every twelve months for new LCWRA substantial-risk claimants. If these
    reassessments lead to greater numbers being moved out of LCWRA, then a larger
    proportion of new claimants will be claiming purely on a short-term basis.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    In this Autumn Statement, the Government has made three changes to the WCA descriptors,
    to apply from September 2025 for new entrants only, and a separate change to the process
    around reassessments. These changes are:
    • Removal of the ‘mobilising’ descriptor that enables entry into the LCWRA caseload.
    • Amendment of the ‘substantial risk’ descriptor that enables entry into the LCWRA
    caseload.
    • Amendment of the ‘getting about’ descriptor that enables entry into the LCW caseload.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Vanessa · 5 months ago
    Hi all what I won't to know will someone be finding these jobs for us? Because who is going to employ mentally ill or disabled people? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jill · 5 months ago
      @Vanessa It's not about you getting a job it's about them saying you could work then remove £390 off u.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Debbie · 5 months ago
    Debbie
    Made me laugh Merry Christmas Mr Hunt thanks for ruining our Christmas., I def wont be voting Conservatives again, i only did when Boris was in government. Ok so lets take things into perspective, the government cant force those who are "genuinely" too unwell for work back to work, theyl find a legal challenge on there hands and everyone no point in stressing about something we cant change. Im disabled i have mobility issues what they going to do force a herd mentality of course not. How are they going to force us to work from home, you need the internet costs the earth, laptops, its ludicrous., because thats the only way to work at home., they havnt thought this through and typical MP's. Honestly think this through everyone if your genuinely not well for work or have other issues like caring etc they will have to work this on a case by case basis. Good luck Conservatives winning the next election. I can understand helping those with other health problems than disability and the long term unemployed, but dont punish those who have genuine disabilitys, as i say we cant change what we cant change!. Cross that bridge when we have too. Remember you all have legal rights with all benefits,
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jas · 5 months ago
    Most people in the Lcwra work for medical science on the NHS surely everyone knows that. If God or the Chancellor cured everyone tomorrow all those medical suppliers would go broke and no need for the NHS as everyone was cured by a miracle or click of a Chancellors button. Absolute attack on the weakest in society sick and disabled. Better off buying a dinghy landing on the beach and claiming asylum. Volunteer for what a future tech system that cuts the workforce to be more efficient and profitable. I've worked in 8 NHS hospitals all now closed that was progress selling off the state. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    RC · 5 months ago
    Here are the new changes to WCA, in essence:

    'From 2025, we will begin to use the terms ‘Work Preparation’ instead of ‘LCW’, and ‘Health Group’ will replace ‘LCWRA’.....

    No changes to Social Engagement Descriptors

    No changes to Continence Descriptors

    Changes to Mobilising, Getting About Descriptors (now Work Preparation, unless substantial risk to health applies)

    Changes to Substantial Risk Criteria

    https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/work-capability-assessment-activities-and-descriptors/outcome/government-response-to-the-work-capability-assessment-activities-and-descriptors-consultation
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    tinycat · 5 months ago
    theres noway charities of mental health are gonna let the forced workplace thing slide, anyone remember new deal by labor this is exactly the same all you will do is be in a room of people ringing up for jobs and filling in cv's all day which does nothing, torys dont care about supporting disabled people in the slightest, and now im worried like everyone else
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Ella · 5 months ago
    How on Earth are they going to offer half a million people mental health treatment when we already have endless waiting lists for talking therapies, psychiatrist appointments etc.?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Angel · 5 months ago
    So if you don’t get a job after so long they stop benefits and medication 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    susan · 5 months ago
    sue have a son with blood cancer he's getting esa and pip he's at his wits end with these changes he's suicidal why are picking on people who are at the bottom of the pile mr hunt we are not all fraudsters. tellyou something i wont be voting for the conservatives.Merry Christmas Mr Hunt thanks for ruining our Christmas. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      blandie · 5 months ago
      @susan Tell your son to try not to worry. It has always been the genuine people who get worried sick about the changes and threats. They are the people who have absolutely no choice to work due to usually losing a job through ill health. Try not to think about it as hopefully existing claimants will be left alone until at least 2029 when wrinkles to the system will have been ironed out hopefully.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Holly · 5 months ago
      @susan They are not touching people with cancer
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anniesnooks · 5 months ago
      @susan He will be getting a decent rise on both pip and esa. Thus us good news for him.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Michael Moran · 5 months ago
    Will my UC be cut if I am a carer for my mother? How can I work if I do this daily from 8.30am
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Michael Moran · 5 months ago
    Will these cuts still happen before next election?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Kerry · 5 months ago
    Does anyone know if there has been an update to the three descriptors for the ESA SG or LWRCA
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 5 months ago
      @Kerry  the Government has made three changes to the WCA descriptors,
      to apply from September 2025 for new entrants only, and a separate change to the process
      around reassessments. These changes are:
      • Removal of the ‘mobilising’ descriptor that enables entry into the LCWRA caseload.
      • Amendment of the ‘substantial risk’ descriptor that enables entry into the LCWRA
      caseload.
      • Amendment of the ‘getting about’ descriptor that enables entry into the LCW caseload
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Clive m stone · 5 months ago
    Well it shows how vile our media are.. all week, they have been saying, if the disabled dnt look for work to do from home, that there cash would be stopped!! Well that wasnt mentioned WHAT SO EVER!! It was all about people on normal UC AND JSA and pushing them to do work programes.... NOT A WORD AGAINST STOPPING ESA/PIP ECT ECT FOR THE VERY LNG TERM.... HOPE THAT HELPS THE MENTAL HEALTH OF YOU GORG BUNCH HEAR X 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      tinycat · 5 months ago
      @Clive m stone mainstream media scaremongery i bet, so they can try and get more of the working people who think all people on benefits are lazy types to vote blue
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The Dog Mother · 5 months ago
      @Clive m stone @Clive m Stone if things continue in that way you've made my Christmas,at very least. 
      I was absolutely miserable at the thought of the nasty party killing more of us off.
      I do however feel for anyone in their grip be it now or in the future.
      You've eased my worried mind and I'm sure many others if all this is true. Thank you. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MrFibro · 5 months ago
      @Clive m stone To Clive m stone,

      It's obvious that the DWP will attack the long term ill and disabled people.  They have used the media to forcibly push out their agenda, by making it look that all ill/ disabled people are fit to work.

      Just goes to show how nasty the media is against their own British vulnerable public.  Wonder how much the government paid them to do that !!

      It's no wonder the nasty Tory party is going to get slaughtered @ the polls, and lose the up coming GE.  I haven't got much confidence in Labour too, but i'd rather vote them, and vote out unemphatic  Tories.  You can forget the Lib Dems, their a waste of oxygen too.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Ells · 5 months ago
      @Clive m stone Thank you for explaining this. Yes I agree absolutely vile for the media to frighten many sick and disable people. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Angel · 5 months ago
      @Clive m stone He stated if don’t find a job after so long they will cut your claim and stop your benefits this along with prescription 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Carol K · 5 months ago
    I'm pleased LHA is increasing to the 30th percentile but it was frozen in 2020, so is this still a real terms cut? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MrFibro · 5 months ago
      @Sarah Sarah,
      what they should had done is..instead of giving the rich tax cuts.  They should of got rid of the bedroom tax for the poorest in our society.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MrFibro · 5 months ago
      @Holly HOLLY

      Thanks for explaining to me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Holly · 5 months ago
      @MrFibro No it means they are only upping it to 800 for the year which is 16 pound a week government will never give800 a month landlords would put rent up
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Sarah · 5 months ago
      @Carol K Why does it keep freezing though? They should adjust it every year
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Anon · 5 months ago
      @Carol K The measure also freezes LHA rates from 2025-26 onwards, thereby
      eroding its generosity over time as rental prices rise.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Rossi2012 · 5 months ago
     My son has several medical conditions including Complex PTSD. He is now worrying about what is to come in the future. I dread to think what how he will cope mentally  th3  o ING months. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    The Dog Mother · 5 months ago
    For some reason I've had trouble accessing here this morning. 
    Never mind.
    Awaiting the onslaught at 12.30 from 'you know who'.
    Thats if I can stay awake long enough. 
    Been reading some comments by members of the general public who are not sick or disabled and a fair lot of them are totally against whats ahead. But some seem to think we live the highlife. 
    They can no sooner know our plight than we understand what it's like to be in full health or a multi millionaire. Think people should think twice before condemning others. Hope springs eternal..  luck to us all. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    tinycat · 5 months ago
    https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/universal-credit-rise-millions-tory-31495345?int_source=nba   i hope this is true it might take some of the anxiety away from people, i have many mental problems, like adhd,aspergers syndrome schizophrenia,borderline personality disorder, with all this in my head it would be allmost impossible for me to function normally in a work place
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      MrFibro · 5 months ago
      @The Dog mother Hi The dog mother,

      Originally Ian Duncan Smith when he was secretary for works & pension. said the same, it was only for new claimant, claiming ESA.  But he then decided to roll it out to everyone who was on long tern ill / disabled.  The object of his game was to kick off as many claimants who were long term ill/ disabled to save money.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      tinycat · 5 months ago
      @The Dog mother im on ir esa and in the support group
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The Dog mother · 5 months ago
      @tinycat @tinycat, So what is being said is this, If you are already claiming disability benefits now ,the changes in the future are for new claiments only? What if like myself you are still receiving IR esa and will be forced onto UC in future. I wonder  if that would be classed as a new claiment or not. As we all know, they like to change things as they go along. I guess things will hopefully become clearer if these unspeakable people win The GE and this hateful nonsense is passed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    JC · 5 months ago
    It was printed in The Times that this isn't going to apply to those who meet LCWRA criteria for socializing or for incontinence. It seems their target is mobility and those who meet the "substantial risk" provision. Can't guarantee The Times is right, and we'll know more quite soon, but this may bring minor comfort to some.   
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    diceman24 · 5 months ago
    i suffer from progressive worked p/time for over 25 years whilst trying to live a normal life  has i could, but over time and getting older had to finally back up work due to my conditon getting worse overtime told  by my doctor and consultants to back up work your putting to much strain on my condition so if this  so called tories want a fight of words with me and everyone else who have health issues  than let them fire 1st and together we can all go to battle with them and remember this gov killed thousands during covid when there was no need to and maybe labour will win the next election next year 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.