A final word

We'll be following up on all of this over the coming days and weeks and clarifying changes to the WCA as they become clearer. 

But having read the comments below, we'd just like to clarify that what the DWP appear to be saying is that if you are currently in the support group for ESA or the LCWRA group for UC then you will never be assessed again unless you report a change in your condition or you are suspected of fraud. 

The only exception to this is people who have LCWRA/support group status because of pregnancy or cancer treatment, as these are expected to be short-term.

If you are migrated from ESA to UC in the future, this won't make a difference because you are not reassessed as part of the migration process.

We don't know what affect the proposed abolition of the WCA might have on all of this. But that is a Conservative proposal which is an awfully long way from becoming a reality and it may well not survive first contact with an incoming government.  It's definitely not something to lose sleep over for a good few years.

In the meantime, after all the menace and rumour in the media over recent weeks, we hope this allows many of our readers to feel a little reassured tonight.


Most people with LCWRA will never face a WCA reassessment again

The DWP response to the WCA consultation says that most people who have been assessed as having limited capability for work-related activity will never have to be assessed again. 

The DWP say

. . . we will bring forward a new offer - a Chance to Work Guarantee for existing claimants on UC and ESA with LCWRA. This change will be effective from 2025, at the same time as WCA changes are introduced. This change will in effect abolish the WCA for the vast majority of this group, bringing forward a key element of our White Paper proposals and giving people the confidence to try work.

9. These changes will mean that almost all people who are currently assessed as having LCWRA will never face a WCA reassessment again. Reassessments will only take place under very limited circumstances, which are:

  • When a claimant reports a change of circumstances in their health condition;
  • If a claimant has been awarded LCWRA for pregnancy risk, or cancer treatment where the prognosis for recovery is expected to be short-term;
  • If a claimant has been declared as having LCWRA under the new risk provisions; and
  • In cases of suspected fraud.

10. For the overwhelming majority of existing UC claimants, this is a guarantee that they will not be reassessed if they try work, and it does not work out. ESA claimants undertaking permitted work will also not be reassessed. Therefore, for both groups, we will remove the barrier that trying work may mean they lose their LCWRA entitlement

 DWP response to the WCA consultation published

The DWP response to the WCA consultation has now been published.  They received 1,348 responses, which appear to have been overwhelmingly negative.

No changes will be made to:

Coping with social engagement

Continence


DWP say most existing claimants will not be affected

The DWP say in their press release that the new changes will not be introduced until 2025 and that most existing claimants will not be affected:

"These changes will not affect existing claimants whose circumstances remain the same, reflecting the need to ensure a continuity of service for them, and will mean that these claimants will not lose money as a result of the changes."

Elsewhere, they add:

  • Under these changes, most existing claimants on health benefits will not need to be re-assessed with a new Work Capability Assessment. Re-assessments will only take place under limited circumstances, which are:

    When a claimant reports a change of circumstances in their health condition;

    If a claimant has been awarded LCWRA for pregnancy risk, or cancer treatment where the prognosis for recovery is expected to be short-term;

    In cases of suspected fraud.

Changes to the substantial risk rule

In their consultation on WCA changes in September, the DWP suggested that the substantial risk rule could be changed as follows:

Alter the rule so that it would not apply where a person could take part in tailored or a minimal level of work preparation activity and/or where reasonable adjustments could be put in place to enable that person to engage with work preparation.

This appears to be what the DWP is now planning to do.


Getting about

The current points for 'Getting about' are shown below. These are to be reduced although we don't know what to yet:

15. Getting about

 15 (a) Cannot get to any place outside the claimant’s home with which the claimant is familiar.  15 points 

15 (b) Is unable to get to a specified place with which the claimant is familiar, without being accompanied by another person 9 points

15 (c) Is unable to get to a specified place with which the claimant is unfamiliar without being accompanied by another person.  6 points

 15 (d) None of the above apply.  0 points


The removed mobilising descriptors

It appears that the DWP plan to stop the following mobilising descriptors allowing claimants to be places in the support/LCWRA group.  These descriptors will still score 15 points for the purposes of limited capability for work, but will not allow access to the support/LCWRA group:

1.  Mobilising unaided by another person with or without a walking stick, manual wheelchair or other aid if such aid is normally, or could reasonably be, worn or used.

Cannot either:

(i)  mobilise more than 50 metres on level ground without stopping in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion

or

(ii)  repeatedly mobilise 50 metres within a reasonable timescale because of significant discomfort or exhaustion.


 Changes to the WCA revealed  

A DWP press release has set out the changes they plan to make to the WCA:

  1. Remove the ‘Mobilising’ part of the assessment that currently places people into a group where no work preparation is required – this will reflect that many of the claimants with these issues in the modern world of work will be able to undertake some work or work preparation with the right support
  2. Amend the regulations that determine whether mental health issues are assessed as putting claimants at ‘Substantial Risk’ if they are required to undertake any level of work preparation - these amendments will realign the regulations with the original intention of applying only in exceptional circumstances, whilst still protecting and safeguarding the most vulnerable
  3. Reduce the points awarded for some of the Limited Capability for Work (LCW) ‘getting about’ descriptors, reflecting the rise of flexible and home working opportunities in modern workplaces.

Over 90% of people denied LCWRA will not move into work

Although the Chancellor announced today that there will be changes to the WCA, we don't know which of the changes set out in their consultation in September they have decided to adopt.

What we do know, however, thanks to the Office for Budget responsibility. is that the claims that the changes are to help people move into work are bogus.

The OBR has published its estimate of the changes to the incapacity caseload as a result of WCA reform.

By 2028/29 they estimate that there will be: 

315,000 fewer people in the UC LCWRA group

56,000 fewer in the ESA support group

Making a total of 371,000 fewer people who get incapacity benefits without having any work related conditions.

But at the same time, they estimate that as a result there will be:

290,000 more people on LCW UC 

51,000 more people in the ESA WRAG 

Making a total increase of 342,000 (possibly some rounding) who have conditions applied to their benefit.

 

 

So, the OBR are expecting around 29,000 people, just 8% of claimants who are denied LCWRA/support group, to actually move off benefits as a result.  The other 92% will stay on incapacity benefits but just be around £400 a month worse off and subject to sanctions.

Thanks to Tom Pollard for tweeting about this.


 

Half a million people to be offered mental health treatment

The chancellor says they will halve the flow of people signed off work with no work search requirements:

Over 180,000 more people will be helped through the Universal Support programme and nearly 500,000 people will be offered treatment for mental health conditions and employment support. 

Over the forecast period, the OBR judge these measures will more than halve the flow of people who are signed off work with no work search requirements.

At the same time we’ll provide a further £1.3 billion of funding to offer extra help to the 300,000 people who have been unemployed for over a year without any sickness or disability.

But we will ask for something in return.

If, after 18 months of intensive support, jobseekers have not found a job, we’ll roll out a programme requiring them to take part in mandatory work placements to increase their skills and improve their employability.

And if they choose not to engage with the work search process for six months, we will close their case and stop their benefits.

Taken together with the labour supply measures I have announced in the spring, the OBR say we will increase the number of people in work by around 200,000 at the end of the forecast period,  permanently increasing the size of the economy.


WCA to be 'reformed'

The chancellor confirmed that changes are to be made to the work capability assessment (WCA) and to the fit note process, though no further details were given about the precise changes to the WCA.

The Chancellor said:

Every year we sign off over 100,000 people onto benefits with no requirement to look for work, because of sickness or disability.

That waste of potential is wrong economically and wrong morally.

So, with the secretary of state for work and pensions, I announced our back to work plan. 

We will reform the fit note process so that treatment rather than time off becomes the default.

We will reform the work capability assessment to reflect greater flexibility and availability of homeworking after the pandemic.

And we’ll spend £1.3 billion over the next 5 years to help nearly 700,000 people with health conditions find jobs.


LCWRA element of Universal Credit (UC) from April 2024

We've calculated the 6.7% uprating for the LCWRA element of Universal Credit for next April as follows:

LCWRA element of UC up from £390.06 by £26.13 to £416.19


PIP rates from April 2024

We've calculated the 6.7% uprating for PIP for next April as follows:

Daily living standard rate up from £68.10 by £4.56 to £72.66

Daily living enhanced rate up from £101.75 by £6.82 to £108.57

Mobility standard rate up from £26.90 by £1.80 to £28.70

Mobility enhanced rate up from £71.00 by £4.76 to £75.76


Pensions triple lock maintained

 

The Chancellor announced that from April 24th "we will increase the full new state pension by 8.5% to £221.20 a week, worth up to £900 more a year."


Local Housing Allowance to be unfrozen

The Chancellor announced that he will "increase the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) to the 30th percentile of local market rents.  This will give 1.6 million households an average of £800 of support."


Benefits to be uprated by September CPI

Good news on uprating.  The chancellor has confirmed that in April 2024 benefits will be uprated by September's Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rate of inflation, which stood at 6.7%.  There had been speculation that benefits would be uprated by the lower October rate.


Autumn statement updates

The Chancellor delivers his Autumn statement at around 12.30pm on 22 November 2023.

Benefits and Work will be providing updates on this page on how the Autumn statement affects claimants, as information becomes available.

In the meantime, heavy hints are being dropped by the government about what may be in it.

Claimants in LCWRA may have to look for work from home

A number of media outlets are suggesting that claimants who are in the Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) group will be required to look for work they can do at home or lose the LCWRA element, worth £4,680 a year. 

This is likely to be a follow up on the consultation on changes to the work capability assessment (WCA), which took place in September.

If this does go ahead, it is unlikely to happen before the next general election and so may be cancelled by an incoming government.

Cut in benefits uprating

Benefits are normally uprated in April by the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rate for the previous September.

But there have been numerous suggestions that benefits may be uprated by the lower CPI rate for October 2023 of 4.7% rather than the September rate which was higher at  6.7%.

This may apply to UC and ESA but may not apply to PIP.

Back To Work Plan

We already know quite a lot about the ‘Back to Work’ plan which involves tougher sanctions and mandatory work placements for some UC claimants.  More details may be released as part of the Autumn statement.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    naheegan · 5 months ago
    I'm confused. The Chancellor announced that he will increase the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) to the 30th percentile of local market rents.  
    According to lha-direct.voa.gov.uk, LHA rents that are currently listed for 2023 are set using a mathematical value called the ‘30th percentile’. 
    So no change then? 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jilly · 5 months ago
      @naheegan The difference is they're currently set using 2020 average rents as that's the last time they re-did them. ( If you look at a LHA chart or list ithe figures don't change for 20,21,23 ) .

      They will now use whatever they are come April 24. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      CC · 5 months ago
      @naheegan Big change, in most areas the LHA doesnt even cover the lowest rents now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      bob · 5 months ago
      @naheegan those rates were the 30th percentile in 2020 or something and frozen at that. it will be set to 30th of 2023/24 and probably frozen at that for another few years.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    K · 5 months ago
    I’m in the support group due to the substantial risk rule and am a bit confused over what all this means to me. Will I be moved to the work related activity group when the changes come in? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      K · 5 months ago
      @Saetana I phoned Scope yesterday as I was so anxious. They were lovely and said no, we won’t be reassessed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Saetana · 5 months ago
      @K Same - I was signed off under this category due to being suicidal.  I am not clear as to whether to new rules apply to those of us who are already in the LCWRA category or not.  Hopefully B&W will clarify this in future newsletters for us.  It sounds like the new rules will only apply to new claims, but I am not at all sure about this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      K · 5 months ago
      @The Dog Mother I’ve read it numerous times now and I think they’re being sneaky in not really spelling it out. I’ve been in extreme distress tonight. I hope you’re right and someone can clarify this
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      CC · 5 months ago
      @K From what I understand on the DWP response page, existing LCWRA claimants are exempt to the WCA changes unless they have a change of circumstances or currently get LCRWA for a short term condition.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The Dog mother · 5 months ago
      @M shirker Not much mention of that today. 
      So not sure what that holds for the future and the new pip  system. I guess its a waiting game. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Sic · 5 months ago
    If you look on the DWP website and the New Chance To Work Guarantee link, scroll to the bottom of the page it says further information, one of the bullet points says “No one in the LCWRA group will face benefit sanctions and all support offered will be voluntary.” How long will that will last I don’t know! The Chance To Work Guarantee is for those currently in the Support Group of UC and ESA if they want to try some kind of work, which is great if that’s what any sick or disabled person wants to do, but they shouldn’t be bamboozled into it by some 22 year old spotty Job Coach who just left college and doesn’t know how to tie up his shoe laces, plus the abolishment WCA is very much welcome!  Some of what has been announced today is a little confusing, as it says one thing in the lines of an angry Sun reader “let’s get these lazy bastards back to work with our new welfare reform programmes” costing billions then it will say in the voice of a squeaky cuddly granny “but it’s all voluntary with no sanctions” its trying to be the good the bad an the ugly all at the same time trussed up as a cheap Christmas Turkey! One thinks it might be an Election ploy to try and get votes off everyone, and when they win the next election 😆😆😆😆 they set the Tory pet sharks on us….sorry I mean Job Centre Work Coaches
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The Dog mother · 5 months ago
      @naheegan naheegan In truth it's the only place I've read clear and concise explanations and found those who even though we may not always agree fully , can still support one another against the regime.
      And most will take time to give an opinion or a slightly different slant on things. It's helped enormously the past number of months. Helped me keep my head together reading the others comments and questions. More power to those who stand between us the the dwp.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      naheegan · 5 months ago
      @Sic All the media rhetoric, all the clamouring and discordant voices interpreting what is meant is the BIGGEST reason for reading a clear and truthful explanation about benefit changes right here on B&W. I am forever grateful for this site, its staff and the mods.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Angel · 5 months ago
    So when they stop someone’s benefit after so long, what are they meant to do go and be on the streets?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Rich · 5 months ago
    Considering PIP will use the same assessment as UC, surely this means when you PIP award ends you could lose it and UC at the same time?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    James h · 5 months ago
    I get most of it looks like new claims only current lcwra doesn’t effect no more wca unless change of circumstances most of them courses are voluntary but what I don’t get is what happened to the abolishment of the wca and the new pip system in 2029 ia that still going ahead 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Embarrassed. And off to chang · 5 months ago
    I'm totally confused by it all. In my early 60s ,chronic mobility problems, constant pain.  I pee myself. Probably some sort of anxiety,  not been out the house alone for over 2 and a half years. can't physically do it. Am taken out in my wheelchair ( when family visit) probably 4 times a year. But I feel safe at home. Osteopenia . Thyroids not right either. None of this is by choice. I used to be fit, well, active, healthy. Responsible job, paid into the system. Becoming disabled was enough of a kick in the teeth
    I get LCWRA , low rate PIP for daily living, high rate mobility. 
    I'd have commented earlier but my meds zonked me out, that's normal though
    And what about my friend who was diagnosed with schizophrenia 15 years ago?
    Where's it leave us?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Grim Reapers revenge plot. · 5 months ago
    Time to take GOV and DWP to Law Courts for abusing diabled rights,they are in fact removing people's human rights as redefining disability,soon there will be No Disabled allowed to just That,disabled.I think Declaration of Human Rights is Universal Worldwide,it clearly states no discrimination allowed,No enforced Labour,look what the Prat ID Smith tried,stacking shelves,got told to shove it up his alimentary passage.😆😄then he cried an ran home to mummy.😄😆☺️
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Francis · 5 months ago
    OK, so to put simply, does the above mean:
    A) Applies to new claimants only.
    B) Those currently in lwrca shouldn't worry unnecessarily.
    Or have I oversimplified!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Claire · 5 months ago
    So it seems that nobody currently in support group or equivalent under uc will be required a wca.They simply would not be able to cope with the numbers.I think the descriptor changes may well go through whoever is in power ,but to new claimants for the next few years.So we must all support each other and please remember people not to give up your esa voluntarily.Everyone who is currently on these benefits will stay as they are so please do not panic.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Claire · 5 months ago
      @Lyndsay Lyndsay,if you are not on current esa and are going onto uc from tax credits you would need a work capability assessment I believe.This would be to get into the equivalent of support group.Gather all evidence now and try to get help if you haven’t done forms before.All the best.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Lyndsay · 5 months ago
      @Claire Thank you for your replies. I claim tax credits as I have a child and my husband works. I don’t think I’m in the group of claimants for 2028? Ive had a leaflet recently telling me of upcoming change onto UC, but no migration letter yet. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      bob · 5 months ago
      @Lyndsay no, wca result carries over.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Claire · 5 months ago
      @Lyndsay The transfer from esa to uc was meant to be on hold until 2028.Nothing has been mentioned about this today because they are only concerned with the next 12 months at most.So they throw out all this red meat to the media and the gullible suck up all the scrounger ,never having to look for work rhetoric.However it now seems they would find it impossible to re test everyone on support group,so are at the moment making the work choice voluntary.This is why it is in everyone’s interest to stay on the esa till the bitter end.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      The Dog Mother · 5 months ago
      @Lyndsay That was my question too earlier. 
      I think as we are already in the system we wouldn't be classed as new. But maybe the others on here will see it differently. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Emily · 5 months ago
    The good news is you never have another WCA horray. The bad news is we assume everyone can do something. If you don’t we stop your money. Did I miss anything? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    DirkDiggler · 5 months ago
    I'm on Income Related ESA and in the Support Group. Does this mean I won't be reassessed in the future now and won't be affected by these changes?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Bob · 5 months ago
      @Zinny On the DWP website it states if you are on ESA Income related and not claiming tax credits migration to UC won't be until 2028. Everybody else will be migrated between 2024/25.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Zinny · 5 months ago
      @Bob
      To Bob  - I thought migration from ESA to UC was to happen during the next 12 months.
      You say DWP told you it would not happen till 2028. Can you send me e-mail confirming this is what you were told? Jan
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Bob · 5 months ago
      @DirkDiggler I think people are confused I am in ESA support group was told some weeks ago the re assessments are starting back next September but now since budget are people already in support group now not getting assessed or am i wrong. It's doing my head in😡
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Bob · 5 months ago
      @DirkDiggler I don't know I'm confused by it. I'm in ESA support income based and was told by DWP that the migration to UC won't be till 2028. Unless the government has changed that.  And next year when we get the general election and labour get in will things be better or worse 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rich · 5 months ago
      @DirkDiggler There seems to be little to no information about how legacy benefits will be treated. In theory they should be moved on to UC LWRCA. This new system is going to be a dog to implement, so can’t see them deal with anything but new claimants for at least a year (2026) imo.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    borkwen · 5 months ago
    It is decades of Conservative governments that has led to so many suffering stress, anxiety and other mental health problems, unable to work in the 'dog eat dog' economy they have brought about. Don't blame the citizens for something that should have been a predictable change in society under the politics of greed and competition.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    LHA local housing allowance rates were set at the 30th percentile in April 2020 but have been frozen since, thereby
    falling below the 30th percentile as rental prices have risen since then. This measure restores
    the 30th percentile level, bringing more rental properties into scope and increasing the
    maximum payable amount. This increases welfare spending by amounts that rise to £1.7
    billion in 2028-29. The measure also freezes LHA rates from 2025-26 onwards, thereby
    eroding its generosity over time as rental prices rise.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    Over the next two years, the Restart scheme expansion will bring forward additional
    employment support to claimants in the intensive work search category who have been
    unemployed for 6 months, rather than 9. The cumulative cost of the expansion is
    expected to be £1.2 billion, which is partially offset by reduced welfare spending of
    £0.1 billion. We assume it will increase the number of long-term unemployed entering
    employment over those two years.15 In 2028-29, employment is therefore around
    5,000 higher than would otherwise be the case.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    Mobility remains a qualifying criterion for receiving PIP, so individuals who would have qualified for LCWRA on the mobility descriptor
    will likely qualify for PIP on the same grounds
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Rich · 5 months ago
      @Anon It looks like mobility will score points, but they won’t count towards being put in the LCWRA group.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    The remaining four labour supply measures are extensions of policies we have costed in our
    March 2023 Economic and fiscal outlook. Taking each in turn:
    • The expansion of the Universal Support scheme increases funding for placements of
    disabled individuals in existing vacancies and for a 'place and train' programme to
    support them. We expect this to increase employment by around 15,000 by 2028-29
    at a cumulative cost of £0.8 billion, which is partially offset by reduced welfare
    spending of £0.2 billion.
    12
    • The expansion of Individual Placement and Support to those with severe mental illness
    is expected to boost employment by around 10,000 in 2028-29.13 The programme
    entails intensive, individually tailored employment support, at a cumulative cost of
    £0.2 billion, which is almost fully offset by reduced welfare spending of £0.2 billion.
    • Expanding access to Talking therapies is estimated to increase employment by around
    10,000 by 2028-29, at a cumulative cost of £0.7 billion, which is partially offset by
    reduced welfare spending of £0.1 billion.
    14 The programme supports those with mild
    to moderate mental health conditions to enter the workforce.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    We expect the WCA reform to raise employment by around 10,000 by 2028-29, as the loss
    of income from the health element (£390 a month) and higher conditionality requirements
    in LCW and intensive work search (IWS) incentivises these individuals to seek employment.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Anon · 5 months ago
    The key uncertainty in this costing is the behavioural response:
    • Given the financial gain from being assigned as LCWRA, as well as the lower level of
    conditionality, we expect some individuals will change their behaviour in the WCA to
    increase their chances of being found eligible for LCWRA against the remaining
    descriptors.
    • We expect the policy to increase the volume of mandatory reconsiderations and appeals
    from those claimants that are moved out of the LCWRA caseload, and that some of these
    appeals will reverse that initial assessment.
    • Some affected claimants will look elsewhere in the benefits system to replace the income
    they have lost. We assume a small proportion of those affected by the removal of the
    mobility descriptor will make a claim for personal independence payment (PIP) when they
    would not have otherwise done so.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.