An ‘Official sensitive’ document obtained via the Freedom of Information Act has revealed more of the DWP’s timetable for the forced move of legacy benefits claimants onto universal credit (UC).  It appears that most claimants will not begin to be moved until the winter of 2023.

The document ‘Move to UC Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy’ divides the move into four phases leading up to the full national roll out of forced migration. 

 Phase One - Discovery

April-June 2022

Small numbers only

 Phase Two – Scaling

June 22 to January 23

Minimum 1,000 claimants

 Phase Three – Scaling

Spring 2023

Minimum 5,000 claimants

 Phase Four – Rollout to national scale

Winter 2023

100,000+

 

Except for an unlucky group of a minimum of 6,000 people, it seems that most legacy benefits claimants are unlikely to be affected by the transfer before the winter of 2023.

However, after that the process will have to go at an extraordinary pace if all 2.6 million affected legacy benefits claimants are to be transferred by the end of 2024.

Each phase is intended to gather more information about such things as how well vulnerable claimants are identified, which groups fail to respond to migration notices, which groups come off benefits altogether and what happens to them.

Claimants will be monitored from the point at which they are asked to move to the time when they are on UC, have been paid and their conditionality regime has been established.

The DWP say that they will be carrying out in depth interviews and large scale surveys as well as ‘tracking claimant interactions using Smartphone Apps’ in order to capture the full range of experiences of claimants undergoing the transfer.

The DWP clearly expect a number of claimants not to make the move because they say that:

‘Research will also be undertaken with a sample of claimants who choose not to make a UC claim to understand what has driven this choice.’

The fact that these may be some of the most vulnerable claimants and that they may not want, or be able, to have a dialogue with the DWP does not seem to be a particular concern.  And the fact that only ‘a sample’ will be contacted is a real cause for concern.

The benefits affected by forced UC migration are:

  • Child Tax Credit
  • Housing Benefit
  • Income Support
  • income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA)
  • income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
  • Working Tax Credit

So far, selected claimants have received a migration notice in:

  • Bolton
  • Falmouth
  • Harrow
  • Medway
  • Truro

The DWP have published an information page for claimants who have received a migration notice.

You can download a copy of ‘Move to UC Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy’

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Sarah · 6 months ago
    I'm 31 had my stroke 5 month ago when I was 30, 4 week after having my daughter, iv just been approved pip
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Caroline · 6 months ago
    Following my stroke in 2015, I applied and was awarded PIP following a face to face assessment. I'd included my consultants report on my stroke and pictures of my brain scans illustrating the brain damage I'd suffered. I got these from the initial hospital I was admitted to by requesting a copy of the MRI scan (£10). Gather as much evidence as you can (even though it's not really something you think of at the time). When the assessor came to my house: Although I'd managed to get some leggings on, I was still in my PJ top! (Though it does admittedly look rather T shirtish) She wrote that I was dressed despite me telling her I couldn't dress my top half! My left arm was in a sling at the time due to repeatedly catching my arm in doors and seat belts (something years later I still do). It's a depressing process as it really rubs in what you can no longer do yourself. I was awarded enhanced mobility, but due to her thinking I could dress myself: the daily living element was standard. I applied for MR and it was turned down so appealed the decision. Beth, the lovely lady from the Stroke Association attended court with me. The court noted something I hadn't considered and immediately granted me the enhanced daily living. 2 years later the same assessor came to review the allowance. I had the appeal judgement letter and asked her if she'd seen it. (Maybe a bit mean of me!) Apparently the assessors are sent the detailed judgements on successful appeals! My award was continued with an ongoing award, no need to review for at least 10 years. Though attending court to appeal is terrifying and degrading having to validate your own circumstances despite medical evidence- I would recommend appealing. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Asha · 6 months ago
    My brother applied for pip. When he had a stroke which changed his life but was flatly refused on both mobility and care.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Stephen cave · 6 months ago
    Hi my brother for 3 years fighting pip last June whent to tribunal they gave him low rate even though should got full pip so put any claim in telling them should been on full pip he’s ad stroke got copd arthritis in legs hands arms in spine pelvis got brain Disorder and mental problems they got back to him in June saying most points he get is six so not intitled to low pip how can they say give six points when year ago tribunal gave him low rate 9 points and he sent in more evidence is condition is worse and got full time carer he as been frighting this now for three years and lost out last year because didn’t get full pip backdated he’s getting more more mental stressed out if got COPD arthritis asthma and ad stroke surely he’s entitled to full pip he lost all back pay for two years because they gave him low rate now put it in again they turned him down and stop pip when tribunal gave him the low rate and sent more evidence that condition is worse and got care comes out how can pip get away with this 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      Jerry · 6 months ago
      @Stephen cave Take it to Tribunal again. I think you should try to get help in filling in the pip claim form - somewhere like Citizens Advice Bureau. Get evidence from your GP to send in with it. Contact the Stroke Association for help in attending the tribunal.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    Jeannie · 6 months ago
    My husband was assessed in 2017. He had a brain stem stroke in 2011 on a flight from Australia. He was initially given 48 hours to live. Could only move his eyelids, was locked in for almost five months. He can now walk a few steps, but is in pain and has numerous legacy symptoms from the stroke. We had a home visit and the first thing the assessor said was “Oh, after reading your application I expected to see a dribbling old man”. She claimed to be a qualified nurse but said she had to look up Brain stem stroke as she didn’t know what it was. She also asked in detail about his incontinence. The evening previous I had received a call from someone at DWP who asked in detail re continence and when I had replied in detail said “this is so you won’t have to answer this question tomorrow.” When I pointed this out to the visiting assessor she still insisted in asking embarassing and highly intrusive questions. I had to watch my very proud husband be humiliated and we were both too worried that if we challenged this questioning it would be seen negatively by the assessor and May affect our application. My husband was granted high in both categories ‘ongoing’ for which we are very grateful but we dread the ‘light touch’ assessment in 2027